2003
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-200301000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of Medial Open Reduction of the Hip in Infants With Developmental Dislocation of the Hip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study [56] found no difference in osteonecrosis occurrence when comparing medial open reduction performed during the first versus second year of life, but did find an association between total osteonecrosis incidence and age using chi square analysis. Another study [49] found the average age at medial open reduction to be significantly older for patients who had osteonecrosis develop than for patients who did not have osteonecrosis develop. Additionally, one study [62] found osteonecrosis occurrence increased with age in a comparison of subjects operatively treated 12 months old or younger, 13 to 24 months old, and older than 24 months old.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One study [56] found no difference in osteonecrosis occurrence when comparing medial open reduction performed during the first versus second year of life, but did find an association between total osteonecrosis incidence and age using chi square analysis. Another study [49] found the average age at medial open reduction to be significantly older for patients who had osteonecrosis develop than for patients who did not have osteonecrosis develop. Additionally, one study [62] found osteonecrosis occurrence increased with age in a comparison of subjects operatively treated 12 months old or younger, 13 to 24 months old, and older than 24 months old.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although some classify it as a form of Grade I osteonecrosis [9,49,81], others do not consider it osteonecrosis [13,20,30,41,56,63,72,85,96]. Because of such variability, osteonecrosis was defined as radiographic changes of Grade II or greater in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Search Strategy and Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations