The primary targets of iron chelators used for treating transfusional iron overload are prevention of iron ingress into tissues and its intracellular scavenging. The present study was aimed at elucidating the capacity of clinically important iron chelators such as deferiprone (DFP) ,
IntroductionCell damage associated with iron overload has been attributed to the emergence of levels of cell labile iron pools (LIPs) that promote production of reactive oxygen species (ROSs) exceeding cellular defense capacities. 1,2 In thalassemia major, there is an outpouring of catabolic iron that overwhelms the iron-carrying capacity of plasma transferrin and generates redox-active forms 1 that may potentially cause tissue iron overload, damaging vital organs such as heart, liver, and endocrine glands. 3,4 The major objective of iron chelation therapy in transfusional hemosiderosis is the reduction of body iron burden by safe removal of toxic iron from organs and extracellular fluids. 1,3,4 The main chelation target has been iron in the liver, the major organ of pathologic iron accumulation. 1,[4][5][6] Outstanding results have been achieved with deferoxamine (DFO), which is administered via parenteral routes. [5][6][7][8][9][10] However, despite intensive chelation treatment, siderotic cardiac disease has been the complication responsible for 71% of thalassemic mortality, while infection accounts for only 12% (hepatic [6%], endocrine [3%], or malignancies [3%]). [7][8][9][10][11][12] A serious factor in treatment outcome has been compliance with the rigorous requirements of daily subcutaneous DFO infusions; therefore, patients who are noncompliant with continuous DFO treatment might die prematurely of cardiac complications. The issue of noncompliance has stimulated the design of alternative, orally effective chelators that would be more convenient for use and thus improve compliance as well as protect hepatic and extrahepatic organs from the deleterious effects of iron overload. 1,5,13,14 This has led to the use of hydroxypyrydin-on deferiprone (DFP or L1) and bishydroxyphenyl thiazole (ICL670 or ICL) as alternatives to DFO. 5,[11][12][13] Hitherto, few studies have dealt with the routes of chelator entry into cells of relevance to iron toxicity and their respective subcellular chelation targets, particularly in iron overload. 15,16 The present work examines the modes by which the 3 clinically important chelators, DFO, ICL, and DFP, gain access to critical sites of iron accumulation in different cells and how those modes contribute to their chelation capacity. The model cell lines used are rat cardiomyocytes (H9C2), mouse macrophages (J774), and human hepatocytes (HEPG2). The analytical objects used to monitor chelator action are the LIPs, [17][18][19] which represent the redox active and chelatable forms of iron that are present in the cell cytosol [20][21][22] and in organelles such as endosome-lysosomes and mitochondria. 16,23 In previous studies, these LIPs were visualized by fluorescent metallosensors targeted principally...