2018
DOI: 10.2172/1476266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of Hg Speciation Testing on the 2Q18 Tank 50 Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After DMA containment in December, fourth quarter 2018 tank 50 samples were the first set analyzed in-house by the DMA instead of the CVAAS and reported to the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). These results compared to an offsite laboratory 34 (61.7 mg/L %RSD 4.6 for n = 3) and to our facility 17 (61.9 mg/L %RSD 0.28 for n = 3) found a % difference ((outside lab -DMA)/(outside lab + DMA)/2 *100) of 0.32%. The first quarter 2019 tank 50 analytical total Hg result (59.8 mg Hg/L %RSD 0.580 n = 3) from our MDA instrument and an offsite laboratory 35 (67.4 mg Hg/L %RSD 5.6 n = 3) also were within our ± 20% (2) uncertainty band with a % difference of 11.9 %.…”
Section: Analysis Of Tank 50 By Cvaas Dma and Icpmsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…After DMA containment in December, fourth quarter 2018 tank 50 samples were the first set analyzed in-house by the DMA instead of the CVAAS and reported to the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). These results compared to an offsite laboratory 34 (61.7 mg/L %RSD 4.6 for n = 3) and to our facility 17 (61.9 mg/L %RSD 0.28 for n = 3) found a % difference ((outside lab -DMA)/(outside lab + DMA)/2 *100) of 0.32%. The first quarter 2019 tank 50 analytical total Hg result (59.8 mg Hg/L %RSD 0.580 n = 3) from our MDA instrument and an offsite laboratory 35 (67.4 mg Hg/L %RSD 5.6 n = 3) also were within our ± 20% (2) uncertainty band with a % difference of 11.9 %.…”
Section: Analysis Of Tank 50 By Cvaas Dma and Icpmsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Similarly, SRNL analysis of monomethyl mercury indicates a monomethyl mercury average value of 21.7 mg/L compared to the Eurofins average value of 20.2 mg monomethyl mercury/L that is calculated from the reported monomethyl mercury of 18.8 mg Hg/L. 13 Analyzed radionuclide concentrations and the respective radiochemical analysis methods, their standard deviations and their corresponding WAC Limits and Targets are shown in Table 3-3 and Table 3-4, respectively. These tables correspond to Attachment 8.3 Limits and Attachment 8.4 Targets, respectively, from the WAC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organo-mercury compounds have been identified in SRS Tank Farm samples in recent studies. 40,41,42,43,44 Methyl mercury is confirmed present in Tank 50 supernate at concentrations up to 60 mg/L. 42 Both dimethyl mercury and ethyl mercury are typically below 1 mg/L; for instance, the 3 rd quarter 2017 Tank 50 supernate showed < 0.17 mg/L Hg as ethyl mercury and 0.062 mg/L Hg as dimethyl mercury.…”
Section: Organo-mercury Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%