1993
DOI: 10.1177/082585979300900204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of Antiemetic Management in Terminal Illness

Abstract: A wide variety of causes may be responsible for nausea and vomiting in terminal illness. The different emetic stimuli reach the vomiting centre by a variety of pathways and can be blocked by specific antiemetics that act at the neurotransmitter receptor sites in these pathways. A knowledge of the neurotransmitter receptor antagonist potency of the different antiemetics allows the choice of the most appropriate antiemetic for the relief of the nausea and vomiting caused by a particular emetic stimulus. To demon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, an empirical approach can be followed, trialling various antiemetics without regard to the underlying cause of the nausea. The two prospective audits of current practice [8,10] suggest the mechanistic approach is effective. The empirical approach may also be highly effective [18,19,21,27] however, and the two approaches have not been directly compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, an empirical approach can be followed, trialling various antiemetics without regard to the underlying cause of the nausea. The two prospective audits of current practice [8,10] suggest the mechanistic approach is effective. The empirical approach may also be highly effective [18,19,21,27] however, and the two approaches have not been directly compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The empirical approach may also be highly effective [18,19,21,27] however, and the two approaches have not been directly compared. If a mechanistic approach is to be followed, it is unclear whether an accompanying algorithm for prescribing is needed [8] or not [10]; either way, 80-90% of nausea responds to treatment. Empirical use of antiemetics acting on multiple receptors, such as methotrimeprazine, olanzepine and levosulpride may be as effective as more specific agents selected by the mechanistic approach, but research on this possibility is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, they still remain useful in the treatment of nausea and vomiting, which is observed in 40-98% of patients with advanced or terminal cancer [19,31,39,61,72]. Again, prior to treatment a careful evaluation should possibly enable the clinician to establish the origin of these symptoms and to identify the pathway of the vomiting reflex and the neurotransmitter receptors involved [52,53,85]. The antiemetic of choice has to be the most potent antagonist to the receptor identified, since its binding affinity predicts the antiemetic efficacy [45,67] (see Fig.…”
Section: Nausea and Vomitingmentioning
confidence: 99%