30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1992
DOI: 10.2514/6.1992-647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of an icing test on a NACA 0012 airfoil in the NASA Lewis Icing Research Tunnel

Abstract: Tests were conducted in the Icing Research Tunnel (lRT) at the NASA Lewis Research Center to document the current capability of the IRT, focused mainly on the repeatability of the ice shape over a range of icing conditions. Measurements of drag increase due to the ice accretion were also made to document the repeatability of drag. Surface temperatures of the model were obtained to show the effects of latent-heat release by the freezing droplets and heat transfer through the ice layer. The repeatability of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there is some variation from run to run in ice accretion geometry under nominally identical icing conditions. This variation has been documented in several earlier studies, [81][82][83][84] In the current study, the non-repeatability of ice shapes was not examined in detail, as the goal was to develop a sub-scale simulation methodology for modeling the iced-airfoil performance of a given ice shape geometry rather than to determine the aerodynamic performance degradation associated with a given set of icing conditions. This second problem was investigated in an earlier study by Campbell et al, [85][86][87] who related not just iced-airfoil performance but also aircraft performance (i.e., stall speed) to icing cloud conditions.…”
Section: Ice Simulation Geometry Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, there is some variation from run to run in ice accretion geometry under nominally identical icing conditions. This variation has been documented in several earlier studies, [81][82][83][84] In the current study, the non-repeatability of ice shapes was not examined in detail, as the goal was to develop a sub-scale simulation methodology for modeling the iced-airfoil performance of a given ice shape geometry rather than to determine the aerodynamic performance degradation associated with a given set of icing conditions. This second problem was investigated in an earlier study by Campbell et al, [85][86][87] who related not just iced-airfoil performance but also aircraft performance (i.e., stall speed) to icing cloud conditions.…”
Section: Ice Simulation Geometry Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Uncertainties in ice geometry should also be considered when using sub-scale methods, as previous studies 24,30,81,87 discussed in Section 2.2.2 have shown that variations in C l,max as large as 13-18% and even larger variations in C d may result from using tracings taken at different spanwise stations, icing tunnel repeatability issues, or very small variations in icing cloud conditions. These latter two issues are associated with the ice accretion process rather than the aerodynamic simulation of a given ice shape, and the corresponding uncertainties are Table 5.1 Summary of aerodynamic fidelity of geometrically-scaled two-dimensional ice casting simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HPC model was applied to the complete 171 sets of data for model validation 3,5,6 . The comparison between the calculated value and the experimentally measured results is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: A Drag Calculation and Correlation To Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flemming and Lednicer extensively investigated high-speed ice accretion on various rotorcraft airfoils 3 . Wind tunnel airfoil drag measurements with ice shapes obtained under comprehensive icing conditions have been carried out by Shaw et al 4 , Olsen et al 5 , and Shin & Bond 6 . Simulated ice shapes have also been used for dry air wind tunnel aerodynamics testing 7,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the application of (3.21) to the equations of motion and the state space models can be written simply as, 24) for the equations of motion and, 25) for the elements of the state space model's system matrix A ∈ R n×n and control matrix B ∈ R n×m .…”
Section: Modeling Ice Accretion Icing Effects Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%