1997
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1997.15.5.1767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of allogeneic bone marrow transplants for leukemia using donors other than HLA-identical siblings.

Abstract: Although transplants from alternative donors are effective in some patients with leukemia, treatment failure is higher than after HLA-identical sibling transplants. Outcome depends on leukemia state, donor-recipient relationship, and degree of HLA matching. In early leukemia, alternative donor transplants have a more than twofold increased risk of treatment failure compared with HLA-identical sibling transplants. This difference is less in advanced leukemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
267
1
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(3 reference statements)
8
267
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of a much larger population of patients with leukemia showed that the relative risk of treatment failure and the overall risk of transplant-related mortality were significantly higher for patients who received a 1-or 2-Ag-mismatched transplant compared with those for patients who received an HLA-identical sibling-donor transplant. 22 In this study, the mortality rate of patients within 1 year was found to be 27.4%, which was lower than that reported earlier. 5,8 Therefore, we suggested that nonmyeloablative HSCT might be a safe therapy for younger patients and for elderly patients without baseline organ dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…An analysis of a much larger population of patients with leukemia showed that the relative risk of treatment failure and the overall risk of transplant-related mortality were significantly higher for patients who received a 1-or 2-Ag-mismatched transplant compared with those for patients who received an HLA-identical sibling-donor transplant. 22 In this study, the mortality rate of patients within 1 year was found to be 27.4%, which was lower than that reported earlier. 5,8 Therefore, we suggested that nonmyeloablative HSCT might be a safe therapy for younger patients and for elderly patients without baseline organ dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…12,25 Notably, although more than half the patients in both graft groups belonged to the high-risk disease category, 2-year relapse rates of 22% after CBT and 30% after BMT were better than previously reported. 1,3,12,25,42 Outcomes of AML patients were apparently good in our study; however, the ratio of advanced and standard AML patients was not especially different compared with other malignancies, and there were no particularly good prognostic factors in the AML group. The safety of the G-CSF-combined preparative regimen for myeloid malignancies has been confirmed [17][18][19] and might contribute to reducing the risk of posttransplantation relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…1-3,9,10,22 They were also superior to TRM and DFS in our BMT group, which were almost the same as previously reported. [1][2][3]22,23 Significant delays in neutrophil and platelet engraftment rates occurred after CBT; however, overall hematopoietic engraftment rates were almost the same for both grafts, as reported, 13 and early death and primary engraftment failure rates were only 4% and 8%, respectively, in our CBT series. These encouraging CBT results reflected the availability of grafts containing sufficient cell numbers 6,7 ; the median cell number was 2.5 ϫ 10 7 cells/kg and only 4 of 68 patients received cord blood containing less than 2.0 ϫ 10 7 cells per kilogram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 However, HLA-mismatched HSCT is associated with increased graft failure, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and a higher risk of treatment failure. 2 GVHD is mediated predominantly by alloreactive donor T cells, which expand in vivo posttransplantation. Nonselective T-cell depletion (nsTCD) of donor grafts is an efficient method for reducing alloreactivity and is very effective at preventing GVHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%