Fringe 2013 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36359-7_129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a Sensitivity Analysis for the Tilted-Wave Interferometer

Abstract: IntroductionTilted-wave interferometry (TWI) is a novel measurement technique for the highly accurate optical measurement of aspheres and freeform surfaces [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. It combines interferometric measurements with ray tracing and mathematical reconstruction procedures. The first results of a sensitivity analysis were given in [8]. The results support the feasibility of the basic TWI principle, and good reconstruction results were obtained for surfaces whose deviations from the design topography are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the approach presented here, the model parameters α sought in equation ( 4) contain the coefficients of the two wavefront manipulators E Q and E P (currently 3696 parameters), the deviations of the sphere positions in x-, yand z-direction (currently 139 × 3 = 417 parameters), and the unknown patch offsets O (typically in the range of several hundred parameters). This high-dimensional nonlinear inverse problem of the model correction is solved by means of a trustregion-reflective algorithm using the Jacobian matrix that contains the partial derivatives of the OPDs with respect to the parameters to be optimized and is calculated analytically for each of the parameters mentioned from the ray path data as shown in [8].…”
Section: Inverse Problem Of the Model Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, in the approach presented here, the model parameters α sought in equation ( 4) contain the coefficients of the two wavefront manipulators E Q and E P (currently 3696 parameters), the deviations of the sphere positions in x-, yand z-direction (currently 139 × 3 = 417 parameters), and the unknown patch offsets O (typically in the range of several hundred parameters). This high-dimensional nonlinear inverse problem of the model correction is solved by means of a trustregion-reflective algorithm using the Jacobian matrix that contains the partial derivatives of the OPDs with respect to the parameters to be optimized and is calculated analytically for each of the parameters mentioned from the ray path data as shown in [8].…”
Section: Inverse Problem Of the Model Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the distance measured by the DMI between the CP and the MP at the center point of the SUT can be applied as a constraint (known surface position) and is not shifted during surface reconstruction. To solve the inverse reconstruction problem, the partial derivatives of the OPDs of the source-pixel pairs chosen with respect to the Zernike polynomial coefficients are analytically calculated from the ray path data as shown in [8,10]. Additionally, the position of the SUT is optimized by using the partial derivatives of the OPDs with regard to the position and orientation of the SUT.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of the Lower Frequency Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations