Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries

Abstract

This study highlights areas where RECs from LMICs can improve to be in compliance with recommended international standards for RECs. The self-assessment tool provides valuable benchmarking data for RECs and can serve as a quality improvement method to help RECs enhance their operations.

A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India

“…The importance of competent committees and comprehensive standards for REC functioning in LMICs is highlighted in the literature (Adams et al, 2014; Chenneville et al, 2014; Makhoul et al, 2014; Matar & Silverman, 2013; Silverman, Edwards, Shamoo, & Matar, 2013; Silverman & Sleem, 2014; Silverman et al, 2014). Nonetheless, concerns remain.…”

Protection of the human research participant: A structured review

“…Spencer et al [14] made use of snowball sampling and used thematic analysis. Silverman et al [12] purposefully selected chairpersons of RECs, and a statistical analysis of the data was done. Stühlinger and Hackl [10] conducted a structured review, with a thematic analysis, to present their data.…”

“…It is essential that every member of the REC demonstrates transparency, integrity and accountability. Adequate resources, legitimatising the authority of a committee and compliance with national laws [12] are crucial. In many African countries, a lack of financial resources to strengthen the capacity of the REC membership is a major challenge.…”

“…Silverman et al [12] conducted a quantitative descriptive study using an online self-assessment tool to gather data from REC members in Egypt, India and SA. The purpose of their study was to assess whether a self-assessment tool could be used to obtain data that reveal the extent to which RECs comply with recognised international standards.…”

“…To describe the issues that have contributed to the dissatisfaction with the ethical review model that is prevalent in a specific university A collaborative approach rather than a regulatory process needs to be adopted; meaningful meetings with researchers, reviewers and potential participants will require extra time Brunger and Russel [9] Canada Participatory action research [12] Egypt, SA and India Quantitative research using an online assessment tool to gather data Chairpersons of RECs in India, Egypt and SA…”