2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.11018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyadministering glimepiride to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with rosiglitazone monotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, favourable effects of RSG/GLIM FDC regimens on markers of insulin sensitivity, free fatty acids and adiponectin are consistent with those previously reported with RSG treatment. These results support previous findings of TZDs in combination with GLIM [38–41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, favourable effects of RSG/GLIM FDC regimens on markers of insulin sensitivity, free fatty acids and adiponectin are consistent with those previously reported with RSG treatment. These results support previous findings of TZDs in combination with GLIM [38–41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Combination therapy with rosiglitazone plus glimepiride versus rosiglitazone plus placebo was evaluated in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study 34. A target HbA 1c of <7% was achieved in the glimepiride group and no significant difference was observed in adverse events between the two groups.…”
Section: Comparison With Thiazolidinedionesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More patients in the glimepiride group achieved the HbA1c target of ≤7% (60% vs 14%; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the rate or type of adverse events between groups, and no episodes of severe hypoglycemia occurred with either treatment (McCluskey et al 2004). It needs to be pointed out, however, that the inclusion criteria of the patients in this trial may have potentially resulted in selection of pharmacological non-responders to rosiglitazone therapy, but unfortunately no pharmacogenetic characterization is provided for the trial participants in this manuscript.…”
Section: Studies Comparing the Rosiglitazone/su Combination Vs Su Monmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In accordance with the current treatment guidelines, rosiglitazone was added to a SU drug in all aforementioned trials, but McCluskey et al (2004) investigated the converse situation. A total of 40 patients who failed on rosiglitazone mono-therapy were treated with additional glimepiride vs placebo for 26 weeks.…”
Section: Studies Comparing the Rosiglitazone/su Combination Vs Su Monmentioning
confidence: 99%