1992
DOI: 10.1159/000474715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a Questionnaire among Dutch Urologists and General Practitioners Concerning Diagnostics and Treatment of Patients with Prostatitis Syndromes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident from the previous study that infectious causes are detected in only 8% of patients and the majority of cases appear to be suffering from either nonbacterial prostatitis or prostatodynia (National Institutes of Health [NIH] category III: CP/CPPS) (Schaeffer et al, 2002). This is likely why urologists in the Netherlands (40%), Wisconsin (59%) and China (64.6%) believed nonbacterial causes to be the most important factor in the aetiology of the syndrome (de la Rosette et al, 1992;Moon, 1997;Yang et al, 2008). However, Dutch General Practitioners (GPs) (63%) and PCPs (78%) in Wisconsin tended to implicate bacterial infection as the most important cause (de la Rosette et al, 1992;Moon, 1997).…”
Section: Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is evident from the previous study that infectious causes are detected in only 8% of patients and the majority of cases appear to be suffering from either nonbacterial prostatitis or prostatodynia (National Institutes of Health [NIH] category III: CP/CPPS) (Schaeffer et al, 2002). This is likely why urologists in the Netherlands (40%), Wisconsin (59%) and China (64.6%) believed nonbacterial causes to be the most important factor in the aetiology of the syndrome (de la Rosette et al, 1992;Moon, 1997;Yang et al, 2008). However, Dutch General Practitioners (GPs) (63%) and PCPs (78%) in Wisconsin tended to implicate bacterial infection as the most important cause (de la Rosette et al, 1992;Moon, 1997).…”
Section: Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely why urologists in the Netherlands (40%), Wisconsin (59%) and China (64.6%) believed nonbacterial causes to be the most important factor in the aetiology of the syndrome (de la Rosette et al, 1992;Moon, 1997;Yang et al, 2008). However, Dutch General Practitioners (GPs) (63%) and PCPs (78%) in Wisconsin tended to implicate bacterial infection as the most important cause (de la Rosette et al, 1992;Moon, 1997). Recently, modern molecular biological research has opened exciting possibilities to discover the causes of this enigmatic disease.…”
Section: Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The urologic evaluation should include urinalysis, urine culture, urine cytology, and urethral cultures [21]. Prostatodynia is a diagnosis of exclusion, where it is assumed that the chronic pain syndrome is related to the prostate, but no inflammatory prostatic process can be identified.…”
Section: Prostatitis and Prostatodyniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that in patients with prostatodynia no infection can be demonstrated, the most frequently advocated treatment is antibiotics, probably based on the assumption that there might be an infection that is undiagnosed [20]. De la Rosette et al [21] reviewed the diagnostic and therapeutic results of patients diagnosed with pain from the prostate. Patients with prostatodynia who received antibiotics for treatment were compared with patients who received no antibiotics.…”
Section: Prostatitis and Prostatodyniamentioning
confidence: 99%