DOI: 10.1159/000402318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a Prospective Ramdomized Study of Hepatic Artery Infusion with 5-Fluorouracil vs. Intravenous 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Hepatic Metastases from Colo-rectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most consistently active agent for this disease has been 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and most regimens have been based on this agent (Table 2). [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Few studies, and certainly none of the most recent studies, have specifically examined the role of systemic chemotherapy for resectable liver disease. However, it is clear that for most chemotherapeutic regimens, less than one third of patients with liver metastases have shown any response.…”
Section: Results Of Medical Treatment Of Isolated Liver Metastatic DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most consistently active agent for this disease has been 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and most regimens have been based on this agent (Table 2). [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Few studies, and certainly none of the most recent studies, have specifically examined the role of systemic chemotherapy for resectable liver disease. However, it is clear that for most chemotherapeutic regimens, less than one third of patients with liver metastases have shown any response.…”
Section: Results Of Medical Treatment Of Isolated Liver Metastatic DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the sarcoma model, the complete surgical removal of the tumor as early as Day 5 after tumor inoculation failed to cure mice and only extended median survival time by 15 days (23). Additionally, systemic and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in the management of liver metatases is also of limited value (30). It is clear that alternative approaches to the treatment of hepatic metastases are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disappointing results of regional chemotherapy demonstrated by these randomised trials has, not surprisingly, led to considerable controversy concerning the value of this approach to the treatment of patients with hepatic metastases (Kemeny, 1992;O'Connell, 1992 (Grage et al, 1979); MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (Kemeny et al, 1987); NCOG, Northern California Oncology Group (Hohn et al, 1989) be achieved. However, co-administration of these drugs has been prematurely abandoned because of an unacceptably high frequency of arterial thrombosis.…”
Section: Pharmacological Rationale For Regional Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%