2000
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/37/1/2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a bilateral comparison of the high-vacuum primary standards at the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science and the UK National Physical Laboratory

Abstract: The high-vacuum standards of the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) and the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in the UK have been compared over the pressure range 4.5 10 -3 Pa to 1.25 10 -2 Pa using argon as the reference gas. Despite large instabilities in the characteristics of the transfer standards, the maximum difference between the data obtained at the KRISS and those obtained at the NPL is less than the combined uncertainty for the two standards.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Type B uncertainties (also known as systematic uncertainties are usuallyˆxed and depend on the design of the system as well as history of measuring instruments used) Fig. 14 Results of the bilateral comparison between; (a) NMIJ (Formerly ETL) and KRISS 46) , (b) NPL (UK) and KRISS 47) . Table 2 For UIM at 1.3125 kPa, the combined standard uncertainty was determined from the quadratic addition of the individual sources.…”
Section: Uncertainties Data Sheetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type B uncertainties (also known as systematic uncertainties are usuallyˆxed and depend on the design of the system as well as history of measuring instruments used) Fig. 14 Results of the bilateral comparison between; (a) NMIJ (Formerly ETL) and KRISS 46) , (b) NPL (UK) and KRISS 47) . Table 2 For UIM at 1.3125 kPa, the combined standard uncertainty was determined from the quadratic addition of the individual sources.…”
Section: Uncertainties Data Sheetmentioning
confidence: 99%