1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90006-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of 1,000 performance knees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is much controversy on the benefits of cemented versus uncemented fixation techniques of TKRs. Uncemented fixation for TKR was introduced as a method of potentially increasing implant longevity [9]. The presence of a more physiological bond between the bone and the implant is considered by some to provide a stronger device [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is much controversy on the benefits of cemented versus uncemented fixation techniques of TKRs. Uncemented fixation for TKR was introduced as a method of potentially increasing implant longevity [9]. The presence of a more physiological bond between the bone and the implant is considered by some to provide a stronger device [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is 7.2 points for KSS knee according to by Lizaur-Utrilla et al [ 30 ]. In the literature, some series comparing cementless and cemented fixations, report statistically higher KSS knee [ 4 , 9 ] and function scores [ 9 ] in the cementless group, as in the Hu et al’s meta-analysis [ 31 ] but none of them are higher than the MCID. The other studies did not report significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, cemented fixation advantages are the instantaneous, spontaneous, and strong primary fixation after acrylic cement polymerization [ 6 ], and the possibility to correct a slightly inaccurate bone cut by the cement thickness, with excellent clinical results and survival rate at 20-year follow-up (FU) in several series [ 7 , 8 ], but on the other hand, cementless fixation allows mechanical and biological fixation by bony ingrowth on the implant surface, reduction of operating time and an osseointegration that would allow a durable fixation [ 2 , 4 , 9 ]. Outcomes at long-term follow-up are also excellent [ 8 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among cases of this type of arthroplasty, reports on the medium to long-term results are scarce. Basset (1) reported that among 1,000 arthroplasty procedures of this type, no complications involving locked polyethylene screws were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports of complications from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relating to the material are rare, except for polyethylene wear 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%