2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from the Virginia Multidisciplinary Team Knowledge and Functioning Survey: The importance of differentiating by groups affiliated with a child advocacy center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that difficulties in MDTs for child abuse that have been found in the literature were not present in our findings. For example, Jackson (2012) found that some MDT members reported the meeting being too long and not providing enough information. They also found differences in perceptions of the MDT based on profession, which we did not find.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that difficulties in MDTs for child abuse that have been found in the literature were not present in our findings. For example, Jackson (2012) found that some MDT members reported the meeting being too long and not providing enough information. They also found differences in perceptions of the MDT based on profession, which we did not find.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work is typically guided by protocols, although these protocols may vary according to the task and locale. The primary goal is case review—sharing of critical information among key stakeholders, enabling service provision and assignment of responsibilities to members of the MDT (Jackson, 2012). Meeting frequency can vary from once a week to monthly.…”
Section: History Of Multidisciplinary Teams With Child Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little research has specifically examined team functioning in CACs. However, the broader literature on multidisciplinary approaches to child maltreatment suggests that team functioning is likely to impact performance and outcomes for children and families served by CACs (Herbert & Bromfield, 2017; Jackson, 2012). A recent scoping review of facilitators and barriers to cross-agency collaboration in child abuse cases identified enabling factors (e.g., leadership, resources), processes (e.g., protocols, joint training), and individual factors (e.g., skills and knowledge, roles and priorities) associated with the quality of cross-agency collaboration and case outcomes (Herbert et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the fundamental principles of CACs is the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) which is comprised of multiple professionals from different service agencies (such as law enforcement, victim services, mental health, court support, etc.) who work together to address a child abuse investigation (Cross et al, 2008;Department of Justice, 2013 ;Jackson, 2012). The MDT can either be co-located at the CAC or located in separate buildings but come to the CAC to provide services to the family in order to provide a "one-stop shopping" approach (Robinson, Hudson, & Brookman, 2008;Wolfteich & Loggins, 2007).…”
Section: Chapter Two: Collaborative Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, a well-operating, communicative MDT should also reduce duplicated and fragmented services (Wolfteich & Loggins, 2007). As with any team environment, collaboration between members can result in increased effectiveness and efficiency but can also lead to frustrations and conflict (Jackson, 2012;Lowe & O'Hara, 2000).…”
Section: Chapter Two: Collaborative Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%