1998
DOI: 10.1136/jms.5.2.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from the Ontario breast screening program, 1990–1995

Abstract: Objective-The Ontario breast screening program (OBSP) is a provincial breast screening programme oVering two view mammography, clinical breast examination, instruction in breast self examination, and systematic two year recall to Ontario women 50 years and older. This paper presents the results of the programme's intermediate outcomes from 1990 to 1995 and compares them with recommended standards and other published programmes. Methods-Programme data from a provincial screening programme in a large Canadian pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall and PPV are known to differ by screening interval and whether a screening mammogram is the initial or a subsequent study. 9,13,14,29 …”
Section: Phase IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall and PPV are known to differ by screening interval and whether a screening mammogram is the initial or a subsequent study. 9,13,14,29 …”
Section: Phase IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women who participate in the OBSP must be residents of Ontario, age 50 and older, have no history of breast cancer or augmentation mammoplasty, and be free of acute breast symptoms. A complete description of the details of the operation of OBSP has been previously published [13].…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only from the HIP trial 25 and from projects in Uppsala, 12 the UK, 18 and Ontario 19 are there reports of a substantially better stage distribution at repeat screenings in comparison with first screenings. In Uppsala there was an important increase in screening performance from the second screening round onward, which is illustrated by the fact that the detection rates in the first and second round of screening are equal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%