Results from the ASTERIA CubeSat Extended Mission Experiments

Fesq, Lorraine; Beauchamp, P.; Altenbuchner, Cornelia; Bocchino, Rob; Donner, Amanda; Feather, Martin S.; Hughes, Kyle; Kennedy, Brian; Mackey, Ryan; Mirza, Faiz; Sternberg, David; Smith, Matthew W.; Troesch, Martina; Seager, Sara; Knapp, Mary; Kolcio, Ksenia; Doran, Patrick

doi:10.1109/aero50100.2021.9438402

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Orbit without the Global Positioning System (GPS). Further demonstrations were planned but instead were run on the testbed following the CubeSat's demise [73].…”

Section: Mars Rovers: Testing Autonomy During Extended Mission Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

Space Trusted Autonomy Readiness Levels

Hobbs¹,

Lyons²,

Feather³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology Readiness Levels are a mainstay for organizations that fund, develop, test, acquire, or use technologies. Technology Readiness Levels provide a standardized assessment of a technology's maturity and enable consistent comparison among technologies. They inform decisions throughout a technology's development life cycle, from concept, through development, to use. A variety of alternative Readiness Levels have been developed, including Algorithm Readiness Levels, Manufacturing Readiness Levels, Human Readiness Levels, Commercialization Readiness Levels, Machine Learning Readiness Levels, and Technology Commitment Levels. However, while Technology Readiness Levels have been increasingly applied to emerging disciplines, there are unique challenges to assessing the rapidly developing capabilities of autonomy. This paper adopts the moniker of Space Trusted Autonomy Readiness Levels to identify a two-dimensional scale of readiness and trust appropriate for the special challenges of assessing autonomy technologies that seek space use. It draws inspiration from other readiness levels' definitions, and from the rich field of trust and trustworthiness.

show abstract

“…Orbit without the Global Positioning System (GPS). Further demonstrations were planned but instead were run on the testbed following the CubeSat's demise [73].…”

Section: Mars Rovers: Testing Autonomy During Extended Mission Phasementioning

confidence: 99%