2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.021303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from a Search for Dark Matter in the Complete LUX Exposure

Abstract: We report constraints on spin-independent weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP)-nucleon scattering using a 3.35 × 10 4 kg day exposure of the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment. A dual-phase xenon time projection chamber with 250 kg of active mass is operated at the Sanford Underground Research Facility under Lead, South Dakota (USA). With roughly fourfold improvement in sensitivity for high WIMP masses relative to our previous results, this search yields no evidence of WIMP nuclear recoils. At a WI… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

51
1,904
3
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,619 publications
(1,965 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(31 reference statements)
51
1,904
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the current experimental upper bound from the LUX 2016 result [33] and the prospective reach in the future LUX-ZEPLIN DM experiment [34] are also shown as the dashed and the dotted lines, respectively, which will be derived in …”
Section: Jhep07(2017)048mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the current experimental upper bound from the LUX 2016 result [33] and the prospective reach in the future LUX-ZEPLIN DM experiment [34] are also shown as the dashed and the dotted lines, respectively, which will be derived in …”
Section: Jhep07(2017)048mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger values of Ω th h 2 may be obtained by increasing µ which leads to reduced Higgsino component of the LSP, hence smaller annihilation cross-section. The LSP scattering cross-section on nucleons for all the benchmarks is below the LUX limits [68] but within the future reach of Xenon1T for direct detection via spin-independent (SI) LSP-nucleon interactions [69]. The compatibility with the LUX constraints is the reason for choosing negative value of M 1 in the benchmarks because µM 1 < 0 allows for some cancellations in the Higgs coupling to LSP which results in smaller SI scattering cross-section [70].…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)050mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limits are shown at 90% C.L. For comparison, results from direct detection experiments (LUX [67], PandaX-II [68], XENON [69], superCDMS [70], and CRESST-II [71]) are also shown. The comparison is model dependent and solely valid in the context of this model.…”
Section: A Limits On the Visible Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[GeV] The results from this analysis, in which the region inside the contour is excluded, are compared with limits from the LUX [67], PandaX-II [68], XENON [69], superCDMS [70], and CRESST-II [71] experiments. The comparison is model dependent and solely valid in the context of this model, assuming Dirac fermion DM, mixing angle sin θ ¼ 0.3, and the coupling values g q ¼ 1=3 and g χ ¼ 1.…”
Section: A Limits On the Visible Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%