The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from a multi-physics numerical benchmark for codes dedicated to molten salt fast reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this case, the following exact values for k * ef f are 0.98708 in the decoupled case (case 0), 0.93515 in the affine case (case 1), 1.00000 in the parabolic case (case 2), 0.98490 in the piecewise affine case (case 3), 1.00444 in the parabolic case approached by an affine functions (semi-analytical case 1) and 0.98928 in the piecewise affine case projected on affine functions (semi-analytical case 2). This investigation shows that some times, the exigence of accuracy of the operational calculations [11] could be lightened.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For this case, the following exact values for k * ef f are 0.98708 in the decoupled case (case 0), 0.93515 in the affine case (case 1), 1.00000 in the parabolic case (case 2), 0.98490 in the piecewise affine case (case 3), 1.00444 in the parabolic case approached by an affine functions (semi-analytical case 1) and 0.98928 in the piecewise affine case projected on affine functions (semi-analytical case 2). This investigation shows that some times, the exigence of accuracy of the operational calculations [11] could be lightened.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To verify the newly developed multiphysics model for LFMSRs in the present study, we conducted a numerical benchmark test that was proposed by the National Center for Science Research (CNRS) in Grenoble, France, to test multiphysics coupling effectiveness for different high-fidelity tools. 24 In this work, we also model this benchmark to compare developed tool performance against the benchmark participants. Therein, the computational domain is treated as a homogeneous bare reactor.…”
Section: Iib Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the capability of the simulation tool, we compared benchmark results for fast spectrum MSRs (Ref. 24). Then we investigated the behavior of the LFMSR simulation for the conceptual TerraPower reference design 1 during operational transients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, multi-physics codes developed at four institutions supporting the SAMOFAR project were benchmarked against each other for their ability to model steady state coupling and timedependent modeling of a simple representation of the MSFR [167]. Although standardized, the benchmark is still representative of the main features of the MSFR, including coupling between thermal hydraulics and neutronics codes in the fast spectrum with delayed neutron precursor transport.…”
Section: Salt-fueled Molten Salt Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%