The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from a degradable TMC joint Spacer (Artelon) compared with tendon arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
2
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
110
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Four patients underwent revision surgery. This rate is substantially higher than previously reported [8][9][10][11]. We could not identify any factors that were significantly associated with the revision rate.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four patients underwent revision surgery. This rate is substantially higher than previously reported [8][9][10][11]. We could not identify any factors that were significantly associated with the revision rate.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The Artelon spacer is a T-shaped device made of a degradable polycaprolactone-based polyurethaneurea that was developed for use in thumb CMC arthritis to resurface the distal aspect of the trapezium and to stabilize the trapeziometacarpal joint by augmentation of the joint capsule [8][9][10][11]. The device is meant as a biological spacer to prevent bony impingement while providing a scaffold for tissue ingrowth to occur as resorption of the device occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common theme in studies in which a Kirschner wire was used after the surgical procedure [3,6,14,15] was that patients were casted or splinted at least until the wire was removed, which occurred 4 to 5 weeks after surgery. For the studies in which some sort of joint prosthesis was implanted [1,9,18,20,21,24], postoperative immobilization time ranged from 2 to 6 weeks. The type of immobilization used for the studies was described in varying detail.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manuscripts that formed the major portion of the review (n = 22) include those focused on arthroscopic débridement or partial trapeziectomy with case series and adequate outcomes data (n = 11) [2,9,14,15,17,18,21,25,27,28,34]; open series that provided information regarding the interposition material or changes in the STT joint or MCP hyperextension (n = 7) [8,10,23,[31][32][33]39]; and review or techniques articles or a case study with some limited original clinical data (n = 4) [4,5,12,41].…”
Section: Search Strategy and Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two manuscripts were case series or reports documenting inflammatory response and unsatisfactory results in terms of pain relief [8,37] resulting in revision surgery and explantation. Others [23,31,32] documented comparison studies between the Artelon 1 spacer and tendon arthroplasty. Patients with the Artelon 1 implant had a higher rate of swelling and revision surgery in two series, generally as an explantation and conversion to arthroplasty (six of 72 [32] and two of 13 [23]).…”
Section: Manufactured Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%