1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf01450257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results concerning the nature of the continuity of solutions of parabolic equations and some of their applications

Abstract: Theorems are established which deal with the relationship between the moduli of continuity with respect to x and with respect to t (in the spaces C and L l) for the solutions of certain classes of parabolic equations, which are, in general, nonlinear and degenerate. These theorems are then applied to an investigation of the Cauchy problem for quasilinear equations of the first and second order.w Introduction. The structure of parabolic equations entails a certain "disparity" of the independent variable t, corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove that the difference approximations possess some L 1 time continuity, we shall use the following lemma due to Kružkov [33]. Lemma 2.4 (Kružkov's interpolation lemma [33]).…”
Section: Some Mathematical Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To prove that the difference approximations possess some L 1 time continuity, we shall use the following lemma due to Kružkov [33]. Lemma 2.4 (Kružkov's interpolation lemma [33]).…”
Section: Some Mathematical Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 2.4 (Kružkov's interpolation lemma [33]). Let z(x, t) be a bounded measurable function defined on R d × (0, T ).…”
Section: Some Mathematical Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subtracting (2.17) from (2.16) and dividing by Ax, we obtain Lemma 2.3 follows directly from the bound (2.13) and the difference equation (1.7). And Lemma 2.4 can be proved by employing the discrete version of a technique due to Kruzkov [7] for deducing a modulus of continuity in time from a known modulus of continuity in space for solutions of certain parabolic equations. The proofs of Lemmas 2.3 and 2.4 are nearly identical to those of Lemmas 2.6 and 2.7 in [5], and in any case they impose no further constraints upon the mesh parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this direction, see Aronson [2], Kruzhkov [17], Caffarelli-Friedman [7], Gilding-Peletier [14], Gilding [13], DiBenedetto [10], Bénilan [6], Aronson-Caffarelli [5] and DiBenedetto-Friedman [11].…”
Section: Remark 1 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%