1992
DOI: 10.1017/s0033822200064237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results and Methods in the Radiocarbon Dating of Pottery

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The main problem with dating pottery by radiocarbon is that many different carbon sources, of different radiocarbon age, may contribute to the potsherd carbon content. Also, the process of firing is liable to destroy information that might help separate possible sources. We describe several pottery dating projects in which we have dated separate fractions (such as humics, lipids and classes of residual carbon). Although in some cases consistency between results is sufficient to accept that this appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, instead of using soot or charred food residues, we have targeted short-lived organic materials, either sealed in the matrix of pots (grass) or deposited on the pot surface when they were fired (chaff). These types of organic temper are considered to be reliable materials for 14 C dating (Hedges et al 1992). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, instead of using soot or charred food residues, we have targeted short-lived organic materials, either sealed in the matrix of pots (grass) or deposited on the pot surface when they were fired (chaff). These types of organic temper are considered to be reliable materials for 14 C dating (Hedges et al 1992). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every charred seed or fragment of charcoal recovered from flotation and every bone or pot sherd recovered from the finds tray is a potential sample. New types of material, cremated bone and residues on pottery (Lanting et al 2001;Hedges et al 1992;Berstan et al 2008), can now be dated. So, our choice has never been greater, but again we must admit failure.…”
Section: The Continuing Radiocarbon Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples from Perth High Street were ideal for radiocarbon dating as they had thick (1-to 2-mm), highly carbonized encrustations of food on the external surface. Food residues are susceptible to geochemical contamination (Bonsall et al 2002); however, this is unlikely to be an issue here because of the degree of carbonization (Hedges et al 1992). Fifteen carbonized rim sherds of shelly-sandyware fabric from the earliest phases (all from contexts associated with the earliest buildings on the site) were chosen for analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%