2016
DOI: 10.1080/03626784.2015.1133220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restyling the humanities curriculum of higher education for posthuman times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the field of Higher Education Mazzei (2016) generates a communal 'voice without organs' in her research with women academics in the USA, Taylor and Gannon develop diffractive methodologies to explore time and academic labour across the UK and Australia (2018), Murris (2016) constructs posthuman pedagogies in South Africa and the contributors to Taylor and Bayley (2019) explore a range of experiments in international Higher Education. Siddiqui (2016) considers how the Humanities curriculum in Canada might respond to posthumanism, whilst Weaver (2010) proposes moving curriculum studies into liberal arts or science faculties. Braidotti (2013b) optimistically argues that new interdisciplinary formulations such as 'Death Studies' (2017) are means by which posthuman formulations can flourish in the university of the future.…”
Section: Background: Humanism/posthumanism In the Western European Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the field of Higher Education Mazzei (2016) generates a communal 'voice without organs' in her research with women academics in the USA, Taylor and Gannon develop diffractive methodologies to explore time and academic labour across the UK and Australia (2018), Murris (2016) constructs posthuman pedagogies in South Africa and the contributors to Taylor and Bayley (2019) explore a range of experiments in international Higher Education. Siddiqui (2016) considers how the Humanities curriculum in Canada might respond to posthumanism, whilst Weaver (2010) proposes moving curriculum studies into liberal arts or science faculties. Braidotti (2013b) optimistically argues that new interdisciplinary formulations such as 'Death Studies' (2017) are means by which posthuman formulations can flourish in the university of the future.…”
Section: Background: Humanism/posthumanism In the Western European Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dewey’s understanding of these problems in education is humanist, yet it is worth acknowledging that Dewey’s ‘texts are not univocally or easily humanist’ (Snaza, 2017: 15). In this vein, Siddiqui (2016) applies the term ‘pre-posthuman’ to Dewey’s philosophy, because ‘several components suggest a readiness for a posthuman embrace’ (72). Even so, Dewey’s portrayal of these problems in education came to a focus on a humanized subject-matter.…”
Section: Changing Education With Posthumanist Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%