Abstract:Background
Management of anemia in surgical oncology patients remains one of the key quality components in overall care and cost. Continued reports demonstrate the effects of hospital transfusion, which has been demonstrated to lead to a longer length of stay, more complications, and possibly worse overall oncologic outcomes. The hypothesis for this study was that a dedicated restrictive transfusion protocol in patients undergoing hepatectomy would lead to less overall blood transfusion with no increase in ove… Show more
“…40 Restrictive protocols for blood transfusion in patients undergoing elective hepatectomy have also been shown recently to decrease blood transfusions without increases in morbidity or mortality. 46 With regard to blood-saving measures for hepatectomy, several therapies and technical maneuvers have been examined. One single-institution, randomized controlled trial from Asia suggested that perioperative administration of tranexamic acid may decrease blood loss and eliminate the need for blood transfusion after hepatectomy.…”
“…40 Restrictive protocols for blood transfusion in patients undergoing elective hepatectomy have also been shown recently to decrease blood transfusions without increases in morbidity or mortality. 46 With regard to blood-saving measures for hepatectomy, several therapies and technical maneuvers have been examined. One single-institution, randomized controlled trial from Asia suggested that perioperative administration of tranexamic acid may decrease blood loss and eliminate the need for blood transfusion after hepatectomy.…”
“…In addition, the revised 72-hour NSQIP-reported blood transfusion variable allows for improved data recording and outcome estimates compared to the pre-2010 variable, which only captured blood transfusions greater than 4 units. The interaction between extent of resection and blood transfusion has been proposed previously [8]. In addition, other surrogates of more extensive operation including intraoperative management, tumor size, and associated resections have been described [14, 15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood transfusion is associated with higher costs and increased risk of associated morbidity. Multiple recent studies have suggested worse oncologic outcomes most notably in patients with primary or metastatic malignancies leading to proposals for transfusion restrictions in patients undergoing hepatectomy [8, 9]. …”
Background
Previous studies have indicated that blood transfusion is associated with increased risk of worse outcomes among patients selected for hepatectomy. However, the independent effect of transfusion has not been confirmed. We hypothesize that blood transfusion is an independent factor that affects outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy.
Materials and Methods
Patients at tertiary care center who underwent hepatectomy between 2006 and 2013 were identified and linked with the ACS-NSQIP PUF dataset. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of blood transfusion on 30-day mortality and morbidity, adjusted for differences in extent of resection and estimated probabilities of morbidity and mortality.
Results
Among 522 patients in the study, 48 (9.2%) patients required perioperative blood transfusion within 72 hours of resection, and 172 (33%) underwent major hepatectomy. Indications for hepatectomy included metastatic neoplasm (n=229, 44%), primary hepatic neoplasm (n=108, 21%), primary extra-hepatic biliary neoplasm (n=23, 4%), and non-malignant indications (n=162, 31%). Eighty-eight (17%) patients had a postoperative morbidity. Blood transfusion was significantly associated with postoperative morbidity (OR 4.18, 95% CI 2.18–8.02, p=0.0001) and mortality (OR 14.5, 95% CI 3.08–67.8, p=001), after adjustment for the concurrent effect of NSQIP estimated probability of morbidity (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.11–12.2, p=0.042). The extent of resection was not significantly associated with morbidity (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.74–2.28, p=0.366) or mortality (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.24–5.50, p=0.870).
Conclusions
Blood transfusion is a highly statistically significant independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. Judicious use of perioperative transfusion is indicated in patients with benign and malignant indications for liver resection.
“…Some limitations for their conclusion have to be mentioned: a) unbalanced group size (no transfusion in 151 patients vs. transfusion in 8 patients); b) important confounding variables are not reported e.g. preoperative haemoglobin, type of surgery (open vs. laparoscopic) and haemostatic management.The risk of allogenic red blood cell transfusion might be associated with major liver resection, preoperative anaemia and female sex [3,4]. Recently the concept of a multidisciplinary patient blood management in order to enhance efficacy and safety of perioperatively used blood products emerged in literature [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of allogenic red blood cell transfusion might be associated with major liver resection, preoperative anaemia and female sex [3,4]. Recently the concept of a multidisciplinary patient blood management in order to enhance efficacy and safety of perioperatively used blood products emerged in literature [5,6].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.