2020
DOI: 10.1111/fcp.12522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restrictive allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation: is there a place for nintedanib?—a case report

Abstract: One of the posttransplantation complications is represented by chronic lung allograft dysfunction, which has two main clinical presentations: bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome. The latter being challenging because of poor prognosis and only symptomatic treatment, and characterized by fibrotic process. A 63‐year‐old man was right lung‐transplanted in 2009 due to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In 2011, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was diagnosed evolving to restrictive allo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study by Nasser et al the decline in FVC was less in those that received nintedanib compared to placebo, however the upper lobe volume loss determined by CT measurements did not differ over time between groups [38,91]. In the case report by Pluchart et al regarding the use of nintedanib in a post-lung transplant patient, there was no clinical change after 4 months of treatment with treatment eventually discontinued due to adverse effects [95]. For pirfenidone, in the case report by Sato et al, their patient had stable pulmonary function tests after initiation of pirfenidone, however this patient had mixed PPFE and UIP, as confirmed by open lung biopsy, so it is unclear if the PPFE responded to pirfenidone or just the UIP [94].…”
Section: Treatment Clinical Course and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study by Nasser et al the decline in FVC was less in those that received nintedanib compared to placebo, however the upper lobe volume loss determined by CT measurements did not differ over time between groups [38,91]. In the case report by Pluchart et al regarding the use of nintedanib in a post-lung transplant patient, there was no clinical change after 4 months of treatment with treatment eventually discontinued due to adverse effects [95]. For pirfenidone, in the case report by Sato et al, their patient had stable pulmonary function tests after initiation of pirfenidone, however this patient had mixed PPFE and UIP, as confirmed by open lung biopsy, so it is unclear if the PPFE responded to pirfenidone or just the UIP [94].…”
Section: Treatment Clinical Course and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Photophoresis therapy has been tried in lung transplant patients with RAS/PPFE but similar to other treatments described above has not been shown to be effective, although it may be helpful in those with strictly BOS [92,93]. Recently, use of nintedanib and pirfenidone has been described in a small series of patients with either idiopathic or secondary PPFE [37,91] and in case reports after lung transplant in those with RAS/PPFE [94,95]. In the study by Nasser et al the decline in FVC was less in those that received nintedanib compared to placebo, however the upper lobe volume loss determined by CT measurements did not differ over time between groups [38,91].…”
Section: Treatment Clinical Course and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary data from a case series of 11 RAS patients showed that pirfenidone stabilised lung function during long-term treatment and provided a bridge to a second lung transplant in three patients (27%) [ 142 ]. Published data with nintedanib are limited to case reports: one showed a clinical benefit in a patient with BOS after HSCT [ 143 ], and another showed no benefit in a patient with BOS after lung transplantation [ 144 ].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antifibrotic therapies, pirfenidone and nintedanib, have also been investigated as a potential treatment modality for CLAD since its pathogenesis, especially the RAS phenotype, shares many similarities with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These drugs are currently only FDA approved for the treatment of IPF and currently available evidence for CLAD is largely limited to case reports or case series that have shown stabilization or slowing rate of decline of pulmonary function after treatment with pirfenidone or nintendanib 60,61 . Vos et al.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%