1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90487-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restriction site periodicities in highly repetitive DNA of primates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. The DNA sequence is in agreement with the known restriction map for this sequence (8). The 343-base-pair fragment is comprised of two wings, denoted "Papio 1" and "Papio 2" in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2. The DNA sequence is in agreement with the known restriction map for this sequence (8). The 343-base-pair fragment is comprised of two wings, denoted "Papio 1" and "Papio 2" in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The similarities among the D)NA sequences in Fig. 3 support the concept that all these highly repeated primate DNA sequences were derived from a common ancestral sequence (8,16,20). Among the primate repeated sequences in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alpha satellite DNA is a tandemly repeated DNA family based primarily on a -170-to 172-bp repeat length (4,14,16,19,20,34). This length, the alphoid monomer, is the smallest repetitive unit of alpha satellite and exhibits no recognizable internal redundancy (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although alpha satellite comprises tandem monomers, this unit size does not necessarily correspond to the size of the presumed amplification domain during evolution. Like other tandemly repeated mammalian satellite DNAs, alpha satellite DNA can be characterized by longerrange periodicities marked by the presence of regularly spaced restriction enzyme recognition sites that define a higher-order repeat length (2,4,13,14). Since definition of a higher-order repeat unit is dependent on the adventitious use or availability of a particular (and a priori unknown) restriction enzyme(s), conclusions regarding the equivalence of such operationally defined repeat lengths and repeat lengths of actual evolutionary significance are made with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%