2003
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restriction of multiple divergent retroviruses by Lv1 and Ref1

Abstract: The mouse gene Fv1 encodes a saturable restriction factor that selectively blocks infection by N‐tropic or B‐tropic murine leukemia virus (MLV) strains. Despite the absence of an Fv1 gene, a similar activity is present in humans that blocks N‐MLV infection (Ref1). Moreover, some non‐human primate cell lines express a potentially related inhibitor of HIV‐1 and/or SIVmac infection (Lv1). Here, we examine the spectrum of retrovirus‐restricting activities expressed by human and African green monkey cell lines. Hum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
217
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
217
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since neither treatment nor efficient vaccines are available, infection is commonly controlled by early diagnosis and culling (23). Recently, the study of host cell restriction factors interfering with the retroviral life cycle, such as the tripartite motif-containing 5 (TRIM5) protein, has gained interest (10,37). TRIM5 family members bear a RING-B-box-coiled-coil structure consisting of an N-terminal RING domain (with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity), a B-box domain, and a coiled-coil domain (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since neither treatment nor efficient vaccines are available, infection is commonly controlled by early diagnosis and culling (23). Recently, the study of host cell restriction factors interfering with the retroviral life cycle, such as the tripartite motif-containing 5 (TRIM5) protein, has gained interest (10,37). TRIM5 family members bear a RING-B-box-coiled-coil structure consisting of an N-terminal RING domain (with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity), a B-box domain, and a coiled-coil domain (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we tested the restrictive role of OvT5 against VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-2 viral vectors encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP), prepared by Fugene-6 transfection of 293T cells as described previously (10). We infected OvT5-MDTF cells and quantified infection at 48 h by measuring GFP expression using flow cytometry (BD FACScalibur).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncoating events are likely to be relevant to HIV-1 tropism restrictions in cells of some nonhuman primate species, given the substantial reduction in reverse transcription products detected in newly infected cells (2,15,29). Thus, although HIV-1 entry into cells of several Old World monkey species is efficiently supported by simian CD4 and chemokine coreceptors (14,35), HIV-1 infection of these cells is restricted at a postentry step (2,3,15,28,31,45). Old World monkeys are natural hosts for SIV mac , which is not susceptible to postentry restrictions in these cells (16,30,31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the receptor for VSVg is a membrane phospholipid 26 and for LCMV it is a-dystroglycan, 27 the restriction observed must occur at some stage after entry. Therefore, the low permissiveness of HVS-T cells may be due either to intrinsic cellular factors present in T cells 28,29 or to the possible expression of HVS latent genes that might interfere with lentiviral vector transduction. In our case, viral interferences are unlikely since HVS cells are permissive to HIV-1 infection 30,31 and the expression of the HVS latent gene stpC enhances HIV-1 replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 If HVS immortalization does not block HIV replication but rather enhances it, T-cell factors must be primarily involved in explaining the relatively low permissiveness of HIV-1 vectors in HVS-T cells. In fact, T lymphocytes have several mechanisms that are capable of inhibiting HIV-1 replication 28,29 and so it is likely that the restriction observed results from a behavior mirroring primary T cells. This would explain why the lentiviral vector acts equally well or even more efficiently on HVS-T cells than it does on primary T cells ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%