2020
DOI: 10.21608/puj.2020.38378.1084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Blastocystis spp. in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals from Alexandria, Egypt

Abstract: Background: Blastocystis spp. is a unique enteric parasite commonly found in the intestines of humans and animals. In humans, prevalence up to 60% has been reported in tropical, subtropical, and developing countries. Currently 26 subtypes (STs) of Blastocystis have been described based on sequence analysis, 9 were reported in humans. Objectives: The aim of the work was to determine the different genotypes of Blastocystis spp. in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Alexandria city, Egypt. Subjects and M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall prevalence of this parasite determined via the qPCR assay was 72.4% (597/825) (Table 1). As expected, this prevalence value of 72.4% was higher than those reported in other previous surveys conducted in Egypt, which ranged from 15.4% to 63.0% [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Indeed, in these latter studies, the parasite frequency was determined via direct microscopy of fecal smears or after in vitro cultivation of stool samples, which are conventional detection methods known to significantly underestimate the true incidence of the parasite compared to molecular assays [52,53].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The overall prevalence of this parasite determined via the qPCR assay was 72.4% (597/825) (Table 1). As expected, this prevalence value of 72.4% was higher than those reported in other previous surveys conducted in Egypt, which ranged from 15.4% to 63.0% [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Indeed, in these latter studies, the parasite frequency was determined via direct microscopy of fecal smears or after in vitro cultivation of stool samples, which are conventional detection methods known to significantly underestimate the true incidence of the parasite compared to molecular assays [52,53].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…34.9 Data presented as n (%), +ve = positive, -ve = negative, ( # ) % of Blastocystis within the same group, (*) P-value ˂ 0.2 is significant. 9), (11,12): PCR positive samples showing distinct band at 600 bp; ( 8), ( 10), (13)(14): PCR negative samples ). Despite the relatively high prevalence of gut parasites in our study population, all of them were protozoa and there was no case with helminthic infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding clinical features of Blastocystis infection, literature reported several symptoms, such as abdominal pain, anorexia, flatulence, nausea, diarrhea, in addition to association with IBD. [ 4 , 6 ] Blastocystis has also been regarded as an opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised patients. [ 7 ] On the other hand, other studies proposed Blastocystis sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…might help in determining the pathogenicity of Blastocystis sp. [ 4 ] Regarding pathogenicity, we tried to associate the different detected subtypes of Blastocystis sp. to abnormal colonoscopic and histopathological findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%