2003
DOI: 10.1080/713756679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricting the field of view to investigate the perceptual spans of pianists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
112
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
112
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it is a common notion in all research on expertise that experts can overcome some limitations of short-term memory capacity by processing familiar information in meaningful chunks (e.g., Chi, 2006), it may then well be that this "chunking" is demonstrated also in proficient sight-readers' eye movements; however, this issue demands further investigation. Skilled sight-readers also demonstrate longer eye-hand spans than those less proficient, as mentioned above, implying that they look farther ahead while playing (Furneaux & Land, 1999;Gilman & Underwood, 2003;Truitt et al, 1997; see also Goolsby, 1994a). Furthermore, Goolsby (1994aGoolsby ( , 1994b reported that not only did more skilled sight-readers' visual attention move ahead from the point of execution while sight-singing, but they also tended to return to the current place of execution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Because it is a common notion in all research on expertise that experts can overcome some limitations of short-term memory capacity by processing familiar information in meaningful chunks (e.g., Chi, 2006), it may then well be that this "chunking" is demonstrated also in proficient sight-readers' eye movements; however, this issue demands further investigation. Skilled sight-readers also demonstrate longer eye-hand spans than those less proficient, as mentioned above, implying that they look farther ahead while playing (Furneaux & Land, 1999;Gilman & Underwood, 2003;Truitt et al, 1997; see also Goolsby, 1994a). Furthermore, Goolsby (1994aGoolsby ( , 1994b reported that not only did more skilled sight-readers' visual attention move ahead from the point of execution while sight-singing, but they also tended to return to the current place of execution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A second technique identifies the average number of notes between fixations. A third technique identifies the "eye-hand span," the discrepancy between the note being played and the eye position (Furneaux & Land, 1999;Gilman & Underwood, 2003;Goolsby, 1989Goolsby, , 1994aGoolsby, , 1994bSloboda, 1977;Truitt et al, 1997;Weaver, 1943). Using these first three techniques, estimates of the spatial range of "instantaneous" perception have varied from 1-8 notes.…”
Section: Oes Music Rehearsal Improve the Range Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth technique used to examine the spatial range of perception while reading music uses the gazecontingent moving window paradigm to identify the "perceptual span," i.e., the effective visual field for perception during a single fixation (Gilman & Underwood, 2003;Truitt et al, 1997). Studies on the cognitive control MUSIC REHEARSAL INCREASES THE PERCEPTUAL SPAN FOR NOTATION of eye movements (McConkie & Rayner, 1975;Rayner, 1998) have demonstrated that the spatial range of "instantaneous" perception effectively reflects the visual processing that occurs within a single fixation.…”
Section: Oes Music Rehearsal Improve the Range Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By recording eye fixations on specific objects shown in a photograph of a natural scene we can determine the objects that attract attention, and the order in which they are fixated can be taken as an indication of their saliency. Unlike the eye movements made while reading text (Rayner, 1998) or while reading musical notation (Gilman & Underwood, 2003), where the structure of the array requires a sequence of fixations in a well-defined order, the order of fixations made to scenes is not prescribed by the need to generate a sequenced output. Scenes can, in principle, be inspected with fixations made in a number of sequences, although regularities can be observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%