2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32298-3_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted Identification Scheme and Diffie-Hellman Linking Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Domain-specific pseudonyms [5,20,22] only slightly improve the situation: instead of being globally linkable, different uses are only linkable by the same verifier, but not across different verifiers. We believe this still weakens the unlinkability too much.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain-specific pseudonyms [5,20,22] only slightly improve the situation: instead of being globally linkable, different uses are only linkable by the same verifier, but not across different verifiers. We believe this still weakens the unlinkability too much.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocols of the German identity card and (some of) the eIDAS extensions have been analyzed in a series of works [7,11,15,10,5,6,13,8,12]. In fact, supporting the protocols by security arguments in form of cryptographic proofs has been a key point in the marketing strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain-specific pseudonyms [5,15,16] only slightly improve the situation: instead of being globally linkable, different uses are only linkable by the same verifier, but not across different verifiers. We believe this still weakens the unlinkability too much.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%