2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enfi.2011.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricciones físicas en UCI: su utilización y percepción de pacientes y familiares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Regarding alternatives, the family presence was pointed out by nurses as a barrier to physical restraint use. 5,21 In the units included, family visiting policies are flexible but they are not allowed to stay 24 h a day. As cited in other studies, relatives were usually informed after restraint application, fact that caused a first disapproval from the family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…36 Regarding alternatives, the family presence was pointed out by nurses as a barrier to physical restraint use. 5,21 In the units included, family visiting policies are flexible but they are not allowed to stay 24 h a day. As cited in other studies, relatives were usually informed after restraint application, fact that caused a first disapproval from the family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As cited in other studies, relatives were usually informed after restraint application, fact that caused a first disapproval from the family. 21 However, once they were informed, they approve the measure, or even request their use due to the perception of patient's loneliness. Therefore, it could be interesting to find out the impact of open visiting policies and family members' involvement in the care of critically ill patients on physical restraint implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that PR use in Canadian ICUs is frequent despite provincial legislation and national accreditation standards requiring restraint minimization to maintain patient safety and provide quality health care [16,31]. Internationally, use of PR in ICUs is highly variable with recent survey data and observational studies reporting prevalence rates between 15% and 100% [9,12,28,32-34]. The highest prevalence rates (for example, 90% or 100%) were found in single ICU settings [9,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acuerdo con Pérez la restricción a la movilidad es aceptada y percibida por los pacientes como una medida que favorece la recuperación de la salud, mientras que por otros, como una medida innecesaria y que denota falta de confianza en el paciente, argumentando también una falta de información respecto a la medida y sensaciones de angustia derivada de la sujeción (55).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified