1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07485.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restraint Reduction in a Nursing Home and Its Impact on Employee Attitudes

Abstract: A restraint-reduction program in a nursing home can produce positive results in terms of decreased restraint use and supportive employee attitudes. More practical alternatives to restraints need to be developed for application in the training of nursing home employees. Future studies on resident, employee, and family attitudes about restraint use are suggested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
21
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar ndings were reported by other studies using nurses (Helmuth, 1995;Karlsson et al, 1998;Sundel et al, 1994;Thomas et al, 1995). Our ndings also showed that for social workers, who are not involved directly in the daily care of the elderly patients and in the decisions to restrain, issues of safety and appropriate treatment were of utmost importance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar ndings were reported by other studies using nurses (Helmuth, 1995;Karlsson et al, 1998;Sundel et al, 1994;Thomas et al, 1995). Our ndings also showed that for social workers, who are not involved directly in the daily care of the elderly patients and in the decisions to restrain, issues of safety and appropriate treatment were of utmost importance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They demonstrate conclusively, through analysis of prevalence and intensity, that both clinically relevant and statistically significant levels of restraint reduction can be achieved without increasing staff, serious injuries, or psychoactive drug use. These results are supported by other reports regarding restraint reduction, 14,15,34,35 post‐restraint reduction of falls, 34 and staffing, 34,36 thus adding confidence regarding generalizability. While some may conclude from these findings that reducing restraint use to less than 10% may be extremely difficult, an equally viable interpretation is that by extending the rather modest intervention beyond 6 months, full restraint removal may be possible.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, there is a need to examine in closer detail the contents of education and the knowledge, competence, and roles of different professional groups in decision making on restraint use. It may not be possible to eliminate restraint use altogether, but there is some research evidence indicating that it is possible to reduce its prevalence by educating staff in alternative ways of treating residents' behavior symptoms and by informing staff about legal and ethical matters that should be taken into account when considering restraint use 36–40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%