2009
DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.07061456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restrained Eating and Risk of Gaining Weight and Body Fat in Middle-Aged Women: A 3-Year Prospective Study

Abstract: Women who do not become more restrained in their eating over time are at much greater risk of gaining weight and BF compared with those who become more restrained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an “obesogenic” environment, many opportunities exist to increase eating frequency and therefore kcal intake. In a 3‐year prospective study involving midlife women, women who increased their level of restrained eating compared to those who did not were at lower risk of gaining weight (39). In the present study, overweight/obesity status was positively associated with intake of fat, refined grains, red meat, added sugars, and sugar‐sweetened beverages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an “obesogenic” environment, many opportunities exist to increase eating frequency and therefore kcal intake. In a 3‐year prospective study involving midlife women, women who increased their level of restrained eating compared to those who did not were at lower risk of gaining weight (39). In the present study, overweight/obesity status was positively associated with intake of fat, refined grains, red meat, added sugars, and sugar‐sweetened beverages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite null effects reported in two studies that relied upon self-reports to measure body mass index (BMI) (Delinsky & Wilson, 2008;Tiggemann, 2004), much of the related theory and prospective research (Chaput et al, 2009;Drapeau et al, 2003;Hawks, Madanat, & Christley, 2008;Klesges, Isbell, & Klesges, 1992;Schur, Heckbert, & Goldberg, 2010;Snoek, van Strien, Janssens, & Engels, 2008;Stice, Cameron, Killen, Hayward, & Taylor, 1999;Stice, Presnell, Shaw, & Rohde, 2005;Van Strien, Herman, & Verheijden, 2014;Tucker & Bates, 2009), has linked RE to increased risk for future weight gain and onset of obesity. For example, Schur et al (2010) found monozygotic and dizygotic twins with high dietary restraint scores show more weight gain over time than did their co-twins, even after adjusting for potential confounds (education, smoking history, baseline body mass index, time elapsed between surveys).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Where interventions that focus on relaxation of restraint (a so-called 'undieting' approach) have been compared with those promoting restraint, the inclusion of restraint produces better weight loss results. [49][50][51][52] Longitudinal studies overwhelmingly show that increases in restraint over time are associated with greater weight loss, 45,[53][54][55] and also with better weight maintenance after weight loss. [56][57][58][59][60] Studies of long-term weight suppressors (people who have successfully maintained a weight loss) show that this group have high levels of restraint together with low levels of disinhibition 42,[61][62][63] and report vigilant self-monitoring of eating behaviors and weight.…”
Section: Widely Used Methods Of Measuring Dietary Restraint Confound mentioning
confidence: 99%