Pond Conservation in Europe 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9088-1_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoring ponds for amphibians: a success story

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We spent a maximum of 30 min searching for amphibians including all the microhabitats that were present in the ponds. Although we did not measure the probability of detection, the dip-netting method we used is a generally accepted procedure, and this duration should give representative results in accordance with other studies performed in small waterbodies (Rubbo and Kiesecker 2005;Rannap et al 2010;Vági et al 2013). Presenceabsence data were recorded for each amphibian species.…”
Section: Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We spent a maximum of 30 min searching for amphibians including all the microhabitats that were present in the ponds. Although we did not measure the probability of detection, the dip-netting method we used is a generally accepted procedure, and this duration should give representative results in accordance with other studies performed in small waterbodies (Rubbo and Kiesecker 2005;Rannap et al 2010;Vági et al 2013). Presenceabsence data were recorded for each amphibian species.…”
Section: Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In the case of P. fuscus, this pattern is in accordance with former studies. In a large-scale restoration in Estonia, where some old ponds were restored and many new ones created, the number of ponds occupied by P. fuscus increased by 6.5 times in only 3 years (Rannap et al 2010).…”
Section: Species Turnover and The Role Of Body Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our artificial ponds, we used 18 garden ponds (1.7 m × 1.2 m, 344 L capacity, Lowe's model # FPSK91) that had been installed ≥140 m apart from each other in a grid throughout the study site in March 2014 [26]. Distance between ponds was designed to minimize noise contamination among ponds while still reflecting clustering that is often exhibited in constructed wetland systems [7,28,29]. Ponds were flush with the ground and made of flexible polyethelene liner that had two shallow shelves on each side (22.86 cm deep) and a deeper middle (45.72 cm deep).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shoo et al 2011). In North America and Europe habitat creation has been successfully used to increase abundance in threatened (Rannap et al 2009) and non-threatened amphibians (Vasconcelos and Calhoun 2006). To succeed, newly created pools must provide suitable habitat and have high levels of connectivity (Lesbarreres et al 2010).…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%