2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoring dead wood in forests diversifies wood-decaying fungal assemblages but does not quickly benefit red-listed species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enrichment of dead wood at the landscape scale had significant effects on saproxylic beetle and fungal communities, after only 10 years following its implementation. This is in line with findings of well‐designed experiments at the stand scale that suggest short‐term positive effects of dead‐wood accumulation for saproxylic organisms (Hyvärinen, Kouki, & Martikainen, ; Komonen et al, ; Pasanen et al, ; Seibold et al, ). Historically intensively managed, and hence species poorer forest stands, aligned with forest reserves after 10 years of dead‐wood enrichment in terms of gamma diversity and community composition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The enrichment of dead wood at the landscape scale had significant effects on saproxylic beetle and fungal communities, after only 10 years following its implementation. This is in line with findings of well‐designed experiments at the stand scale that suggest short‐term positive effects of dead‐wood accumulation for saproxylic organisms (Hyvärinen, Kouki, & Martikainen, ; Komonen et al, ; Pasanen et al, ; Seibold et al, ). Historically intensively managed, and hence species poorer forest stands, aligned with forest reserves after 10 years of dead‐wood enrichment in terms of gamma diversity and community composition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…for timber production) (Morales-Hidalgo, Oswalt, & Somanathan, 2015), debates on the effectiveness of land sparing versus land sharing concepts (Fischer et al, 2008;Grau, Kuemmerle, & Macchi, 2013) are important, and conservation strategies need to be assessed for their efficacy. It has been shown that land sharing, that is, integrative conservation approaches in European forests, can locally promote saproxylic organisms, depending on the time-scale and taxon, by restoring or retaining dead wood and old-growth elements (Brunet & Isacsson, 2009;Komonen, Kuntsi, Toivanen, & Kotiaho, 2014;Pasanen, Junninen, & Kouki, 2014;Vandekerkhove & Thomaes, 2016). However, most of these approaches are restricted to the stand scale, and landscape-wide applications of dead-wood enrichment and their evaluation with respect to biodiversity are rare.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional ecological restoration imitating natural disturbances may therefore be important strategies in mitigating negative effects on biodiversity (Angelstam 1998;Lindenmayer et al 2006;Gonzales 2013). Even though ecological restoration has been on the agenda for some time, relatively little has been practiced within industrialized forestry in boreal biomes, and even more so the efforts taken have rarely been properly evaluated (but see: Toivanen and Kotiaho 2007;Olsson and Jonsson 2010;Hekkala et al 2014a, b;Pasanen et al 2014). It is therefore of utmost importance to gain more knowledge on how we can reintroduce natural-like disturbances under controlled settings in boreal forest systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthy, diseased and dead trees provide (i) essential habitats for a wide variety of organisms (Lonsdale et al, 2008;Penttil€ a et al, 2013;Burns et al, 2014;Pasanen et al, 2014) and (ii) key ecosystem services needed by the growing human population, both in rural and urban settings, in developed as well as developing countries, from tropical to boreal regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%