2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01804-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoring a butterfly hot spot by large ungulates refaunation: the case of the Milovice military training range, Czech Republic

Abstract: Background Refaunation/rewilding by large ungulates represents a cost-efficient approach to managing natural biotopes and may be particularly useful for areas whose biodiversity depends on disturbance dynamics and is imperilled by successional changes. To study impacts of refaunation on invertebrates, we focused on butterflies inhabiting the former military training range Milovice, Czech Republic, refaunated since 2015 by a combination of Exmoor pony (“wild” horse), Tauros cattle (“aurochs”), a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trait‐based macroecological analyses show that reintroductions of large herbivores have potential to substantially modify ecosystem functioning in ways that increase system diversity and resilience (Lundgren et al, 2020; Schowanek et al, 2021), in line with neo‐ecological evidence from real‐world rewilding projects (Konvička et al, 2021; Ratajczak et al, 2022). Other studies have observed changes in mammalian community FTs and considered wider ecological effects within regions and across the globe (Dantas & Pausas, 2022; Doughty et al, 2016).…”
Section: Examples Of Palaeoecological Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Trait‐based macroecological analyses show that reintroductions of large herbivores have potential to substantially modify ecosystem functioning in ways that increase system diversity and resilience (Lundgren et al, 2020; Schowanek et al, 2021), in line with neo‐ecological evidence from real‐world rewilding projects (Konvička et al, 2021; Ratajczak et al, 2022). Other studies have observed changes in mammalian community FTs and considered wider ecological effects within regions and across the globe (Dantas & Pausas, 2022; Doughty et al, 2016).…”
Section: Examples Of Palaeoecological Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As trophic rewilding is a young field the number of empirical studies on self-identified rewilding efforts remains limited, albeit strongly rising (Svenning et al, 2016;Hart et al, 2023). However, there are many empirical studies on the ecosystem effects and biodiversity outcomes of de facto trophic rewilding, especially in Europe, North America, and southern Africa, often under names such as year-round or extensive grazing, or reintroductions, e.g., with many showing positive biodiversity effects (especially for plants) attributable to bison (e.g, Ratajczak et al, 2022) or feral and semiferal cattle and horses (e.g., Konvička et al, 2021;Dvorský et al, 2022;Bonavent et al, 2023;Köhler et al, 2023). Further, several long-term cases of megafauna recovery that did not necessarily emerge out of rewilding principles show how trophic rewilding can result in largescale top-down effects on ecosystems, for example vegetation changes in response to the reestablishment of white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) (Cromsigt and te Beest, 2014) and African savanna elephants (Gordon et al, 2023).…”
Section: Megafauna-based Trophic Rewilding As a Restoration Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overall situation is driven by agricultural economic rationale and further incentivized by the EU common agricultural policy (Kindvall et al 2022). Conservation areas grazed year-round at near-natural herbivore densities have been shown to better support species-rich butterfly communities (Konvička et al 2021). One effect of over-grazing and cutting by machinery is homogenization in terms of vegetation structure and microtopography, which may increase the probability of local extinction in years with weather anomalies.…”
Section: Oddsmentioning
confidence: 99%