2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10612-010-9106-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restorative Justice and “Empowerment”: Producing and Governing Active Subjects through “Empowering” Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Governmentality-oriented explorations of RJ have been available since the early 2000s (Lippens, 2015;O'Malley, 2009;Pavlich 2005;Richards, 2011). Compared to this extant literature, this work is original in a number of interconnected ways.…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Governmentality-oriented explorations of RJ have been available since the early 2000s (Lippens, 2015;O'Malley, 2009;Pavlich 2005;Richards, 2011). Compared to this extant literature, this work is original in a number of interconnected ways.…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The political context of RJ has been extensively explored by both RJ advocates (Braithwaite, 1999;Marshall, 1996;Wright, 1996) and scholars (Dignan, 2005;Hoyle and Cunneen, 2010;Johnstone, 2011;Newburn and Crawford, 2003). The present work can be located within the limited province of the literature on the political background of RJ applying a governmentality mode of analysis (Lippens, 2014;O'Malley, 2009;Pavlich, 2005;Richards, 2011). The paper revolves around the idea that the spreading of legal/policy measures, as well as practical and theoretical interest around RJ, in England and Wales, over the last 30 years, has been possible due to the parallel rise of a combination of political rationalities -that is, ethopolitics (Rose 1996b(Rose , 1999a)informing the governmental practice in the relevant geo-historical setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis proceeds inferentially: firstly it draws the authoritative discourses from the relevant laws, policy documents and literature; it then profiles the 'ideal community' from the authoritative discourses, by piecing together the most recurrent representations of community emerging from the archive. At this point, it is possible to offer an interpretation of how this ideal has emerged and sedimented historically (Richards 2011). Legal and policy regulations, in fact, do not take place in a vacuum, they carry a past with them and are influenced by a wide and stratified range of cultural phenomena.…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Orientationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this normative community implicitly endorses the imposition on individuals of the same binary classifications of 'right' and 'wrong' and 'victim' and 'offender' which belong to ''conventional'' criminal justice, reducing the chances of cooperative relationships between individuals with a stake in a crime. The 'ideal community' is ''just'' another stakeholder entangled in the thin mesh of the mainstream RJ, whereby legal and non-legal (moral, psychological, spiritual) categories constraint participants in order to enfranchise them from the conflict/crime (Richards 2011).…”
Section: Conditions Of Possibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis proceeds inferentially: firstly, it draws the authoritative discourses from the relevant laws, policy documents and literature; then, it profiles the 'ideal' victim, offender and community from the those discourses, by piecing together the most recurrent stakeholders' representations emerging from the archive. At this point, it is possible to offer an interpretation of how those images have emerged historically (Richards, 2011). Legal and policy regulations, in fact, do not take place in a void; they carry a past with them and are influenced by a wide and stratified range of phenomena.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%