2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration treatments in a Montana ponderosa pine forest: Effects on soil physical, chemical and biological properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
142
4
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(54 reference statements)
6
142
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicated that only very frequent annual or biannual burning of the understory litter and shrubs in these forests caused appreciable change in these soil characteristics. This result was consistent with studies in southern loblolly pine forests (Richter, 1982;Binkley, 1982), ponderosa pine forests (Covington and Sackett, 1986;Wright and Hart, 1997;Gundale et al, 2005;Hatten et al, 2005) and oak forests (Boerner et al, 1988;Ferran et al, 2005), all of which showed no or relatively little change in soil pH, cation or total soil C and N in response to single or repeated burning. In New Jersey pine-oak woodlands, Burns (1952) found fire rotations of 4 years increased extractable base cations only slightly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This indicated that only very frequent annual or biannual burning of the understory litter and shrubs in these forests caused appreciable change in these soil characteristics. This result was consistent with studies in southern loblolly pine forests (Richter, 1982;Binkley, 1982), ponderosa pine forests (Covington and Sackett, 1986;Wright and Hart, 1997;Gundale et al, 2005;Hatten et al, 2005) and oak forests (Boerner et al, 1988;Ferran et al, 2005), all of which showed no or relatively little change in soil pH, cation or total soil C and N in response to single or repeated burning. In New Jersey pine-oak woodlands, Burns (1952) found fire rotations of 4 years increased extractable base cations only slightly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Other studies have found fire altered ECM community structure in Douglasfir (Kennedy and Egger 2010 ), ponderosa pine (Gundale et al 2005 ), and spruce (Mah et al 2001 ) forests, without necessarily causing large changes in diversity or biomass, while a study on Scots pine forests in Sweden did not find any consistent change in ECM richness or composition following wildfire (Jonsson et al 1999 ). These varying responses of ECM to fire may indicate that local conditions (such as moisture in our study) can strongly influence the response of ECM to wildfire.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Fire has been demonstrated to alter the community structure of both soil fungi (Cairney and Bastias 2007 ) and ECM fungi (Stendell et al 1999; Mah et al 2001; Dahlberg et al 2001; Smith et al 2005; Gundale et al 2005; Rincón and Pueyo 2010; Kennedy and Egger 2010; Buscardo et al 2012; Barker et al 2013). In addition, disturbance by MPB has been documented to increase fire severity (Turner et al 1999; Page et al 2012, with MPBattacked (red) stands experiencing higher severities of crown fire than might otherwise be expected (S. Taylor, CFS Forestry Officer, pers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective harvesting of overstory trees alters microclimatic conditions at the soil surface, often increasing soil temperatures, and thus can change microbial communities, speed decomposition, and increase nutrient cycling and losses in the short-term when plant uptake is reduced (Kaye and Hart, 1998). However, some studies suggest these effects are subtle or absent after the harvesting event (Dannenmann et al, 2007;Feller et al, 2000;Ganjegunte et al, 2004;Gundale et al, 2005Gundale et al, , 2006, and others show they are transient (Dannenmann et al, 2006). Results also vary in the long-term as some ecosystems support altered rates of microbial activity and soil properties for years following thinning Grady and Hart, 2006;Jonard et al, 2006;Maassen et al, 2006), while other ecosystems show few long-term differences from reference conditions (Gundersen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%