Proceedings of INFOCOM '97
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.1997.635157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration strategies and spare capacity requirements in self-healing ATM networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
128
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LR [3], [6]- [9] reroutes all of the disrupted traffic (going through the failed link) over a single alternate path (or a set of alternate paths) between two end nodes of a failed link, using the spare capacity of the network. In Fig.1, the disrupted traffic (due to the failure of link 5↔7) is rerouted between the end nodes 5 and 7.…”
Section: A Link Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…LR [3], [6]- [9] reroutes all of the disrupted traffic (going through the failed link) over a single alternate path (or a set of alternate paths) between two end nodes of a failed link, using the spare capacity of the network. In Fig.1, the disrupted traffic (due to the failure of link 5↔7) is rerouted between the end nodes 5 and 7.…”
Section: A Link Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PR [3], [6], [8]- [10] reroutes each disrupted path over a single alternate path (or a set of alternate paths) between the source and the destination of the primary path, using the spare capacity of the network. In Fig.1, the (disrupted) primary path 1-3-5-7-9 has a restoration path 1-3-8-9.…”
Section: B Path Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations