The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2010.5627549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of useful vision up to letter recognition capabilities using subretinal microphotodiodes

Abstract: Our group has developed a subretinal microphotodiode array for restoration of vision. In a clinical pilot study the array has been implanted in 11 patients suffering from photoreceptor degenerations. Here we present promising results from some of those patients where the retinal tissue above the chip was functional and the implant fulfilled its expected function. A spatial resolution of approximately 0.3 cycles/degree could be achieved with fine stripe patterns. In one subject where the implant had been placed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Individuals suffering outer retinal blindness, such as late stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or dry age-related macular degeneration, may be able to recover some visual feedback with use of a retinal prosthesis. [2][3][4] These devices stimulate the remaining cells in the inner retina to convey signals to the visual cortex. In theory, stimulating remaining cells in a pattern corresponding to visual stimuli could create visual percepts resembling those stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Individuals suffering outer retinal blindness, such as late stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or dry age-related macular degeneration, may be able to recover some visual feedback with use of a retinal prosthesis. [2][3][4] These devices stimulate the remaining cells in the inner retina to convey signals to the visual cortex. In theory, stimulating remaining cells in a pattern corresponding to visual stimuli could create visual percepts resembling those stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to the epiretinal approach, the use of a subretinal prosthesis does not require any additional fixation tool, as the stimulator remains in stable position after insertion into the subretinal space [20,21]. However, the EPIRET3 approach allows a complete intraocular implantation with wireless energy and signal supply from outside, while the subretinal prostheses require a transchoroidal and transscleral cable connection to the energy source outside the eyeball, which may reveal a certain risk potential in this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…25 While image acquisition is solely intraocular, a cable connecting the implant to a subdermal power control unit, which charges wirelessly through a handheld control unit, enables light-sensitivity adjustment. 26,27 Early models with a transdermal power supply limited the study to 126 days. However, wireless power supply has eliminated the time limitation in later trials.…”
Section: Alpha-imsmentioning
confidence: 99%