2000
DOI: 10.1086/317093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of theASCASource Position Accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a central concentration in AX J1420.1−6049 whose centroided position is ∼ 40 ′′ from the radio position of the pulsar (see below). This is larger than the nominal 90% position uncertainty (Gotthelf et al 2000), but is consistent with the 97% contour; we assume the peak of the X-ray emission is at the position of the pulsar in the following analsysis.…”
Section: Asca Observationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, there is a central concentration in AX J1420.1−6049 whose centroided position is ∼ 40 ′′ from the radio position of the pulsar (see below). This is larger than the nominal 90% position uncertainty (Gotthelf et al 2000), but is consistent with the 97% contour; we assume the peak of the X-ray emission is at the position of the pulsar in the following analsysis.…”
Section: Asca Observationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Gotthelf et al (2000) shows that the peak of the observed emission in the  PSF is inconsistent with the position of sources 1 and 2.…”
Section:  and  Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…3 in Tsuboi, Handa, & Ukita 1999). The position accuracy is about 5A for the radio map and 24A for the GIS image (Gotthelf et al 2000). The 6.4 keV band image shows an X-ray peak (inner region of the solid circle) near the molecular cloud core CO 359.4]0.0 (Oka et al 1998), which is one of the giant molecular clouds in the Sgr C complex, with a mass of D106…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%