1995
DOI: 10.1109/58.393097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of medical ultrasound images using two-dimensional homomorphic deconvolution

Abstract: This paper describes how two-dimensional (2D) homomorphic deconvolution can be used to improve the lateral and radial resolution of medical ultrasound images recorded by a sector scanner. The recorded radio frequency ultrasound image in polar coordinates is considered as a 2D sequence of angle and depth convolved with a 2D space invariant point-spread function (PSF). Each polar coordinate sequence is transformed into the 2D complex cepstrum domain using the fast Fourier transform for Cartesian coordinates. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(11) corresponds to a direct deconvolution filter in frequency domain except for the term S nn (ω)/S hh (ω), which corresponds to the SNR spectrum. It represents the typical design of a Wiener deconvolution filter, whose bidimensional version was already applied to B-mode echography in order to compensate for the point spread func- tion and increase the scanner resolution [46]- [48]. However, such an application required the estimate of both the impulse response function h(t) and the input function f (t), which represented the ultrasound pulse, resulting in a blind deconvolution.…”
Section: Distance D(g(t) * W(t) H(t)) Which Is Defined As D(w) = (Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) corresponds to a direct deconvolution filter in frequency domain except for the term S nn (ω)/S hh (ω), which corresponds to the SNR spectrum. It represents the typical design of a Wiener deconvolution filter, whose bidimensional version was already applied to B-mode echography in order to compensate for the point spread func- tion and increase the scanner resolution [46]- [48]. However, such an application required the estimate of both the impulse response function h(t) and the input function f (t), which represented the ultrasound pulse, resulting in a blind deconvolution.…”
Section: Distance D(g(t) * W(t) H(t)) Which Is Defined As D(w) = (Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now consider the problem of estimating a uniformly regular function f ∈ with ⊂ 2 (ℝ), given its perturbed measurements g according to (1) In what follows, all functions under consideration are real-valued functions, with f considered as a useful signal that needs to be recovered, whereas u is regarded as noise to be rejected. Since, in most practical settings, one is usually concerned with signals of finite length, we restrict the domain of definition of f to the interval Ω = [0, 1].…”
Section: Estimation Of Smooth Functions: Continuous-domain Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the approach of [11] combines the process of integration with a smoothing procedure, thereby being capable of directly recovering the Fourier phase of the PSF (rather than that of the convolution mixture) according to the basic concept of homomorphic deconvolution. 1 A practical limitation of the approach of [11] is the use of second-order partial derivatives as the input data. As a general rule, the higher the order of the derivative, the higher is its susceptibility to aliasing errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations