2013
DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-18-42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular joint separations: surgical technique and preliminary results

Abstract: BackgroundOur purpose was to investigate the clinical efficacy of arthroscope-assisted acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction in combination with double endobutton coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for the treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.MethodsDuring the period from February 2010 to October 2012, ten patients with Rockwood types IV and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation were hospitalized and nine were treated with acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mobile side of the hook plate underneath the acromion may cause symptoms of persistent pain and restriction in movement by acromial erosion and damaging the supraspinatus tendon. 9 , 21 Long-term retention of the plate may lead to acromial osteolysis or fracture, which implies that a second surgery is required to remove the plate after 12 weeks when the ligaments are healed. Kienast et al 7 achieved successful results using the hook plate in 313 patients of Rockwood type III–V AC joint dislocation, while all patients reported pain or discomfort with the hook plate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mobile side of the hook plate underneath the acromion may cause symptoms of persistent pain and restriction in movement by acromial erosion and damaging the supraspinatus tendon. 9 , 21 Long-term retention of the plate may lead to acromial osteolysis or fracture, which implies that a second surgery is required to remove the plate after 12 weeks when the ligaments are healed. Kienast et al 7 achieved successful results using the hook plate in 313 patients of Rockwood type III–V AC joint dislocation, while all patients reported pain or discomfort with the hook plate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective was to prevent complications, especially shoulder pain by minimizing recurrent displacement and joint irritation, and to avoid soft tissue reactions and traumatic arthritis. 19 , 21 Because of the biocompatibility of the device, there is no need to remove the device in a second surgery, which can avoid potential injuries. 22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All clinical tests were negative in 12 patients, seven had one positive test, three had two positive tests, and one had three positive tests. The mean CS result at the follow-up was 93.44 ± 4.90 (range, 84-100), and the mean SST result was 10.78 ± 1.51 (range, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. There was no statistically significant association between the CS results and either shoulder tests or radiological findings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Later, the classification was expanded by Rockwood and Green to types I to VI [4,[9][10][11]. It is widely accepted that type I-II injuries should be treated conservatively, and type IV-VI surgically [3][4][5][12][13][14][15]. The treatment of Rockwood type III injuries remains an object for debate: some studies advocate surgical treatment whilst others do not see a significant difference between surgical and conservative approaches, and highlight that each case should be treated individually [13,14,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are often affect the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments [1]. They account for up to 9% of all shoulder injuries and are second only to glenohumeral joint dislocations [2]. Changes to the integrity of the AC joint impact the shoulder’s function [35] since they alter both scapulothroacic and glenohumeral (GH) kinematics [1, 6, 7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%