2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of elbow flexion in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury – a quantitative analysis of results of single versus double nerve transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fasce et al [ 22 ] showed a mean of 135° in shoulder abduction with triple nerve transfers. In comparison to recently reported double nerve transfer procedures to reanimate shoulder abduction [ 14 , 22 ] or elbow flexion [ 23 ], as well as triple or multiple nerve transfers [ 21 , 22 ], our surgical outcome (double nerve transfers with neurolysis and muscle contracture release) was more effective, as it restored all UE functional movements (shoulder abduction and elbow flexion) to nearly normal ( Figure 2A–2C ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fasce et al [ 22 ] showed a mean of 135° in shoulder abduction with triple nerve transfers. In comparison to recently reported double nerve transfer procedures to reanimate shoulder abduction [ 14 , 22 ] or elbow flexion [ 23 ], as well as triple or multiple nerve transfers [ 21 , 22 ], our surgical outcome (double nerve transfers with neurolysis and muscle contracture release) was more effective, as it restored all UE functional movements (shoulder abduction and elbow flexion) to nearly normal ( Figure 2A–2C ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Addressing nerve root injuries in the context of severe cervical spinal cord injuries resulting in complete paralysis of the extremities has been challenging. Distal-targeted nerve transfers have been successfully performed as a preferred alternative to the site of a proximal injury [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] since the regeneration distance will be much shorter and, therefore, the recovery will be faster. Additionally, in cases of iatrogenic surgical injuries at the proximal cervical spinal level (ACDF), as in the present case report, the distal operative area will have no scarring from previous surgeries, allowing for technical precision in reconstructive efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, nerve transfers recover relatively quickly compared to nerve grafts, which is reported to be one of the most important factors in the number of viable motor axons 1,10,12) . This technique allows the transfer of regenerating motor axons very close to the neuromuscular junction of the elbow flexors, minimizing the distance and time required for the regenerating front to reach the target muscle 2,[10][11][12]14) . Therefore, patients with prolonged onset of disease can also be candidates for this procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%