2019
DOI: 10.3788/co.20191202.0321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration method for blurred star images based on region filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 6 shows that the iteration time of the improved algorithm was the lowest. Although the PSNR of the improved algorithm was 0.7 dB less than that of the KWFLICM algorithm [44,45], the iteration time was 300 s less than that of the KWFLICM algorithm, and the PSNR of the brain CT image segmentation test results in Table 6 was 0.7 dB less than that of the KWFLICM algorithm. However, the iteration time was 45 s less than that of the KWFLICM algorithm.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 6 shows that the iteration time of the improved algorithm was the lowest. Although the PSNR of the improved algorithm was 0.7 dB less than that of the KWFLICM algorithm [44,45], the iteration time was 300 s less than that of the KWFLICM algorithm, and the PSNR of the brain CT image segmentation test results in Table 6 was 0.7 dB less than that of the KWFLICM algorithm. However, the iteration time was 45 s less than that of the KWFLICM algorithm.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remote sensing images of wheat fields, canyons and forests had multiplicative noise added with a mean value of 0 and mean squared deviations of 90, 121 and 61, respectively [50][51][52]. The numbers of clusters were 2, 2 and 3, respectively.…”
Section: Image Segmentation Test With Multiplicative Noisementioning
confidence: 99%