Background:Stress poses a major issue in our modern society, making restoration an
important research focus. Restoration likelihood has mostly been observed in
nature, which was compared with urban environments that have little
restorative potential, eg, industrial areas. However, many people reside in
and need to find restoration in cities. The main aim of this review is to
summarize research that has focused on investigating restoration
possibilities in urban environments and the environmental elements
interacting with the restoration likelihood of an urban environment.Method:This review focuses on studies addressing the topic of restoration
possibilities in urban settings in built and human-made natural urban
environments. The studies were searched via Google Scholar, PsycINFO,
PsycARTICLES, and PSYNDEX. All studies concerned with restoration in urban
environments were included. However, studies concerned with nonoriginal
data, solely investigating effects of natural environments or treating urban
environments as a control for restoration in nature, were excluded from the
review. Overall, 39 studies corresponded to the criteria and were
included.Results:Natural elements in urban environments have a restorative potential and can
increase the restorativeness of urban settings. Furthermore, built urban
environments vary in their restorative potential, but promising results have
been uncovered as well. Architectural elements, cultural, and leisure areas
had a restorative value, whereas the findings on streets and residential
areas differ. In sum, many urban locations can have restorative effects, but
these effects may be influenced by factors such as cultural background, age,
social components, and individual dispositions.Discussion:Certain urban environments hold a restorative potential. However, the
literature on restoration in urban environments is still quite scarce and
therefore has been of little practical use. Even though applying the
findings to real-life environments is desirable, it might prove difficult,
considering the overall sparse evidence. More research on the predictors of
restoration likelihood (eg, social factors), generational and cultural
differences, and comparisons between natural and urban environments is
recommended.