2020
DOI: 10.21325/jotags.2020.650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoranlara Yönelik Tripadvisor Yorumlarının İçerik Analizi Yöntemi İle Değerlendirilmesi: İstanbul Örneği (Content Analysis of Tripadvisor Reviews on Restaurants: A Case Study of Istanbul)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TripAdvisor's users are able to rate restaurants from 1 (terrible) to 5 (excellent); additionally, reviews rated as 'excellent and good' are considered 'positive,' reviews rated as 'average, bad and terrible' are considered 'negative.' (Yetgin et al 2020). In the present study, 79 (80.6%) customers rated restaurants positively while 19 (19.38 %) customers rated negatively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TripAdvisor's users are able to rate restaurants from 1 (terrible) to 5 (excellent); additionally, reviews rated as 'excellent and good' are considered 'positive,' reviews rated as 'average, bad and terrible' are considered 'negative.' (Yetgin et al 2020). In the present study, 79 (80.6%) customers rated restaurants positively while 19 (19.38 %) customers rated negatively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with current results, price (Baek et. all, 2006;Aydın, 2016;Özkale Aslan, 2021) and taste of food (Doğan & Demirtaş, 2021;Yetgin et al 2020;Tokassynova & Akababa, 2017) have been stated as the most emphasized factors in previous studies. According to the reviews, it was understood that Covid-19 security measures (social distance, mask use, temperature control...etc) were decisive.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation