2018 International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iccais.2018.8570530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting-State Regional Homogeneity Analysis on Real-Time fMRI Emotion Self-Regulation Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ReHo maps can potentially serve as a non-invasive prognosis tool for cirrhotic patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy [52], and have a high diagnostic accuracy for congenital blindness [53]. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback and associated brain function self-regulation were found to impact the ReHo scores of brain regions involved in the processing of emotions [54]. In another study investigating the test-retest reliability of ReHo [55], the authors found that this could be improved by employing a fast imaging sequence, using nuisance correction but no spatial smoothing in the preprocessing stage, and by carrying out the analysis on the surface of the brain (in a vertex-wise manner, rather than the voxel-wise implementation of Ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Rehomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ReHo maps can potentially serve as a non-invasive prognosis tool for cirrhotic patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy [52], and have a high diagnostic accuracy for congenital blindness [53]. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback and associated brain function self-regulation were found to impact the ReHo scores of brain regions involved in the processing of emotions [54]. In another study investigating the test-retest reliability of ReHo [55], the authors found that this could be improved by employing a fast imaging sequence, using nuisance correction but no spatial smoothing in the preprocessing stage, and by carrying out the analysis on the surface of the brain (in a vertex-wise manner, rather than the voxel-wise implementation of Ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Rehomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (2012),Dong, Huang, and Du (2012),Fang et al (2013),Gnanadas, Sathishbabu, and Vijayakarthik (2017),Liang et al (2011),Liu et al (2010),Peng et al (2011),Qin et al (2017),Qing, Dong, Li, Zang, and Liu (2015),Qiu et al (2019),Shukla, Keehn, and Müller (2010),Song, Zhang, and Liu (2014),Wang, Song, Jiang, Zhang, and Yu (2011),Wu et al (2007),Wu et al (2009),Yang et al (2018),,Zang, Jiang, Lu, He, and Tian (2004),and Zeng, Pizarro, Nair, , Huang, Lin, and Biswal (2013),Dong, Guo, Zhang, Fu, and Shi (2010),Guo, Dong, Zhang, Zhang, and Yin (2010),Hu et al (2018), Khodaee, Hossein-Zadeh, and Ananloo (2015), Liang, P. (2014),,Meng, Zhang, Fan, and Li (2018),Turner et al (2012),Yan, Zhuo, Wang, and Wang (2011),,,Yu-Feng et al (2007),Zhang et al (2015),Zou et al (2008), andYu et al (2014) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%