2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting-state Functional Connectivity and Deception: Exploring Individualized Deceptive Propensity by Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…refs. [32][33][34][35] ). However, the majority of previously used fMRIbased predictive models were only internally validated (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…refs. [32][33][34][35] ). However, the majority of previously used fMRIbased predictive models were only internally validated (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevance vector regression method which showed better performances than other prediction methods was applied to predict the age (Cui & Gong, 2018 ; Cui et al, 2016 ). A 10‐fold cross‐validation strategy was used to estimate the generalization ability of the prediction mode (Tang et al, 2018 ). Pearson correlation coefficient between the real age and predicted age was calculated to depict the prediction performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noninvasive neuroimaging techniques have contributed to search for quantitative brain-based measurements of psychiatric disorders [79,80]. Nevertheless, neuroimaging markers in psychiatry still lack the level of precision for clinical practice [81]. As pointed out by Etkin, one of the major factors that limited the impact of neuroimaging efforts is the failure in embracing fully data-driven analyses [80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%