2012
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.ej11-0138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting energy expenditure in short-stature children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was confirmed that intake of high biological value protein (intact) in children with MSUD is restricted and 85.5% of it comes from the BCAA-free medical formula (synthetic protein) (Hauser et al 2011;Marugan de Miguelsanz et al 2011;Shimizu-Fujiwara et al 2012). Protein restriction and its quality have been described as possible causes of stunting in children with MSUD, and some research has found that this type of diet may affect BEE variability (Lewis et al 2001;Nishimoto et al 2012;Sentongo et al 2000). However, it is important to highlight that in this group, the BEE did not correlate with any of the macronutrients nor did it relate to protein source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was confirmed that intake of high biological value protein (intact) in children with MSUD is restricted and 85.5% of it comes from the BCAA-free medical formula (synthetic protein) (Hauser et al 2011;Marugan de Miguelsanz et al 2011;Shimizu-Fujiwara et al 2012). Protein restriction and its quality have been described as possible causes of stunting in children with MSUD, and some research has found that this type of diet may affect BEE variability (Lewis et al 2001;Nishimoto et al 2012;Sentongo et al 2000). However, it is important to highlight that in this group, the BEE did not correlate with any of the macronutrients nor did it relate to protein source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The question arises as to whether there is any difference in REE between the lean ISS children and their peers. A study by Nishimoto et al [22] found that in ISS children the adjusted REE was significantly higher than in children with normal height and weight, assuming that a higher REE in lean ISS children equates a higher energy need, and furthermore that the actual REE was significantly higher than the age-matched and height-matched basal metabolic rate as calculated according to the DRI equations. This may suggest that the calculated energy intake according to the DRI was not sensitive enough and that there might be an underestimation of the energy level required to account for the energy expenditure, taking into consideration the energy which is required for growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In patients who had previously undergone PEKT, some residual kidney function was observed, although they did not have a higher REE/Wt than those who had not undergone PEKT, suggesting that the effect of residual kidney function on the REE/Wt is not substantial. Nishimoto et al [5] measured the REE/Wt in short children and compared the age-matched BMR and height-for-age-corrected BMR and reported that the REE/Wt was signi cantly higher than the age-matched BMR and not signi cantly different from the height-for-age-corrected BMR. Thus, even in pediatric patients with CKD, kidney dysfunction does not have a large effect on the REE/Wt, whereas physique is likely to have a large effect on the REE/Wt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%