2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2014.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restauration de la flexion du coude dans les paralysies traumatiques C5-C6 et C5-C6-C7 : étude bicentrique rétrospective comparant simple versus double neurotisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is no direct comparison between the techniques, the study found that for all subjects average elbow flexion increased significantly over 2 years and at final follow‐up (Wang et al, ). Barthel et al () compared 14 patients who underwent ulnar fascicular transfer and 15 patients who underwent double fascicular transfer for traumatic BPI. This study found that, in terms of elbow flexion recovery, there were no significant differences between groups (Barthel et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there is no direct comparison between the techniques, the study found that for all subjects average elbow flexion increased significantly over 2 years and at final follow‐up (Wang et al, ). Barthel et al () compared 14 patients who underwent ulnar fascicular transfer and 15 patients who underwent double fascicular transfer for traumatic BPI. This study found that, in terms of elbow flexion recovery, there were no significant differences between groups (Barthel et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In double fascicular transfer, in addition to ulnar nerve fascicular transfer to the MCN, motor fascicles from the median nerve are also transferred to the MCN to innervate the brachialis muscle (Le Hanneur et al, ). Multiple studies have been performed in small cohorts and have found satisfactory outcomes using both techniques (Barthel et al, ; Le Hanneur et al, ; Wang, Rancy, Lee, Feinberg, & Wolfe, ). The potential gains in elbow flexion strength with additional nerve transfer in these patients must be weighed with the morbidity of harvesting more functional nerve tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barthel et al [15] compares the results between single and double transfer and finds 60% strength at M4 for single and 85% for double transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One year later in 2006, Liverneaux et al also reported success in ten patients treated with this technique (18), and these results have been validated by subsequent publications (24). Both early authors, and others since, agree that double fascicle transfers result in superior results (18,22,(25)(26)(27)(28). Carlsen et al retrospectively compared their results from single and double nerve fascicle transfers, and highlight that those patients receiving single nerve transfers (SFT) had significantly worse preoperative function (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%